The installation options for software (not OS), in the vast majority of cases (apps) we are given the option of FlatPak, appimage or packages (and fucking Snaps), and choosing a GUI 'app store' or CLI. Yes there are cases in which you only have 1 option, but those are not the rule, but the exception. How exactly is this worse than in Windows having to download a .exe file and go through a whole lot of 'accept' dialogs, or Windows store? Isn't this more accessible and friendlier to any taste? One of the reasons my wife is so sold on Fedora Workstation on her PC (while having to use Windows on her laptop because of some backwards bullshit system she needs to maintain our company taxes) is because, believe it or not, stuff just works, anything she wants to do has an option in the 'Software' app for her to just install, and move on (mostly FlatPaks). Windows is constantly giving her issues, pushing crap she's not interested in, suddenly breaking for no apparent reason, wifi randomly disconnecting, or the amazingly insightful 'an error has occurred' or something like that which only serves to state the obvious with absolutely no way to figure out what the fuck went wrong and try to fix it to avoid it happening again.

You actually think Windows provides a better user experience than the shittiest Linux distro with the most horrible DE or WM? You're out of your mind man.

No Linux distro is perfect, but Windows is objectively the biggest pain in the ass to install, maintain, use and even shut down.

I'll challenge you, or anyone, to purposely break your windows system, to the point that reinstalling is the only option to get that computer back up and running, and do the same with any Linux distro (short of fucking Arch). See what provides you with more frustration and longer down time. This is the one thing in which Windows wins every time, fucking down time and frustration. No other OS comes even close.