189
This is a labubu. Now there is another one. There are two _______. (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It follows French, where the adjective comes after the noun.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    I don't really understand the connection, since French has plural adjectives and English doesn't. And in my head, that was also why the above list is the way it is- English doesn't have plural adjectives, so of course you denote the plural through the noun. If it were French, it would be more like attornies generals. Not to mention that some adjectives go before the noun in French, and for those, it's still both the adjective and the noun being made plural at the same time. I'm not a linguist, and also neither native in English nor French, can you explain?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Lots of modern English words came from French, especially Norman French.

    These modern English phrases that follow this “noun then adjective” are French loan phrases (I think). Or, they were constructed to look like French loans, because French was the language of the nobility, a “higher” way of speaking than dirty, peasant English.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    I still don't really understand how that pertains to why the plural -s goes with the noun in fixed phrases like attorney general

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because English doesn't pluralize adjectives. English is a mutt of a language, and it doesn't always make sense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, that's what I'm saying. That's just what English does, and I don't see what it has to do with french.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    These phrases are heavily influenced by French, even if they don't follow all of the exact same rules. "Not pluralizing adjectives" is a more ingrained rule of English than "adjectives come before nouns," so with these phrases, the latter rule is set aside in favor of "Frenchness" while the former rule remains in place.

    The messiness of English is directly because of all the different influences from other peoples and their languages over the centuries; it's not "just what English does" without reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent