607
How decentralized Bluesky is compared to the Fediverse. (europe.pub)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/45188740

https://arewedecentralizedyet.online/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Self-hosting a Bluesky PDS means running your own Personal Data Server that is capable of federating with the wider Bluesky social network.

Seems like it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Oh, I misunderstood. So you mean federating with their network from other software implementing the AT Protocol? From skimming the docs it looks like it should be possible as long as you implement the correct schemas, but I didn’t dive very deep.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    No it doesn't. If other people on bluesky servers want to see your content then obviously it will go through bluesky servers, but if you connect to a 3rd party relay and use a separate appview like zeppelin.social and use DID:Web for account ID then nothing involving the bluesky servers was used and it still behaves like native

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • load more comments (-1 replies)