you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

clearly everyone in the comments immediately pegged this as ai. i did too, but i am not sure what it is specifically that makes this feel so obviously ai. anyone got any ideas what it is that we're all picking up on here?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This is the art style that OpenAI forced its model to generate. Nobody else draws this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It makes you wonder if they have a whole bunch of training data in this style, or if it is the mathematical average of all cartoon styles mashed together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago*

    If it was a simple average it would have been mangled. This is a deliberate fine-tune of the model to the particular style. For fine-tuning you need some type of input, if generated or human made doesn't matter.

    The reason why they fine-tuned to this particular style is unknown, but they might be:

    • To quickly and not as expensively produce and release a usable model in the then more heated, now slowing down competition for better and better models
    • To reduce the model size as there is no need for lots of data on multiple styles.
    • To give a distinct comics style to their model, so to make people associate the image to their model instead of OP

    There is nothing wrong with fine-tuning, and it is very often necessary to have the output not be gibberish.

  • source
  • parent