you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago* (36 children)

Julan Du and Chenggang Xu analyzed the Chinese model in a 2005 paper to assess whether it represents a type of market socialism or capitalism. They concluded that China's contemporary economic system represents a form of capitalism rather than market socialism because: (1) financial markets exist which permit private share ownership—a feature absent in the economic literature on market socialism; and (2) state profits are retained by enterprises rather than being distributed among the population in a social dividend or similar scheme, which are central features in most models of market socialism. Du and Xu concluded that China is not a market socialist economy, but an unstable form of capitalism.

Source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    The CCP got into power seventy-six years ago how long does it take to get into the next stage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Makes sense but seventy-six years is a really long time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    There’s four stages, they’ve been in the first for seventy-six years.

    Doing the math it seems they’ll need another two hundred and twenty-six years to reach the final stage if they got to the second stage tomorrow.

    I’m not sure if I have impossibly high standards or thinking it’s reasonable to wait another nearly quarter of a millennium might be incredibly low standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    China was a largely feudal county working its way out of brutal colonial exploitation - for which the exploiters have never paid reparations and still held on to Hong Kong for decades.

    How long does it take to build productive forces and modernize while still subject to unequal exchange and general imperialism? That is a social and political question, so you tell me about where China was and what its path has been. How many other imoerialized countries jave eliminated absolute poverty, by the way? Not just taking decades to do it, but accomplish it at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] -9 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Something about paying $147 to a capitalist to read books about socialism seems strange.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Imagine living in year 2025 and not being able to figure out how to find a PDF online. Explains why you're such an ignoramus I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why not share the pdf’s and remove a barrier?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Because people doing work need to pay bills and make a living? You also seem to be confused about what capitalism is. A worker selling their own labour is not capitalism. Capitalism is when you use capital to buy up the means of production and then hire workers to work for you and appropriate the value they produce.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

    "Two Chinese said it. What, that isn't enough for you tankies!?"

    • A definitely-not-racist liberal.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    You’re accusing me of being racist because the source I quoted is written by someone in London and Hong Kong?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    I'm calling your tokenizing logic racist. The lack is thought you put into the entire endeavor. I cannot imagine being this lazy, incurious, and racist. Sort yourself out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    I’m well sorted and well adjusted thank you very much for your concern though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    No, you are arrogant and this leads you to false confidence that you can correct people who know more than you by hastily googling, "studies that say China is capitalist" and quoting the first result, patting yourself on the back, and thinking, "you did well, kid".

    Get your racist shit out of here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    I’m unsure why you think you know me well enough to know what I know or don’t know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    You think I can't read your comments or something? This is a habit of yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    You are the first person here to ever accuse me of being racist and that’s including my Lemmy.world account with the same name that I’ve had for over two years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Lemmy.world tolerates racism, same as what it wants to be, Reddit. And likely so does the society you live in.

    Like I said, sort yourself out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I feel like you’re attacking me instead of the facts I laid out because you feel like it’s easier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    You didn't lay out any facts. Did you forget what I'm criticizing you for already?

    I don't hear any sorting! Just whining to justify yourself. Get to it!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    You’re criticizing me for being racist because the study I used as a source was written by someone in England and someone else in Hong Kong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And the bad faith malding continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Sorry if I misunderstood.

    What are you accusing me of being racist for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Scroll up. You're going in circles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Nope just you. Kinda sad that your defense response is to pretend to be illiterate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’m just trying to understand your point.

    Should I be insulting you by calling you an illiterate racist instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I already explained and you avoided it and started doing this pitiful little song and dance. Maybe you can pay someone to take you seriously, because I don't think anyone is going to do it for free.

    Goodbye, chump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)