36
Why does calorie counting work for weight loss and why are calories interchangeable? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

According to a book I am reading, diet science currently agrees that there is one way to loose weight: A calorie deficit.

For example, if I need 2000 kcal a day and eat only 1500 kcal a day, I will loose some weight over the next weeks/months.

To my understanding, calories here are totally interchangeable, if we are only concerned with loosing weight (and ignore nutrients etc).

Calories are basically measured by burning food and measuring how much energy was set free.

My question is: Why and how does it work so good and why are calories interchangeable?

In more detail: Why can we translate the burning of calories with fire to processing the calories in food with our digestion system so perfect? Why is there no difference (concerning weight loss), if I eat 1500 calories as pure sugar or eat them as pure protein (where I would assume the body needs more energy to break down the protein)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 3 points 1 year ago

mass and energy are equals. it's like if a car got smaller whenever it ran out of petrol to burn. it's got to get energy from somewhere to carry on, so it converts mass (fat) into energy to burn it as fuel. if you overfill the tank (eat more calories than you're burning), the petrol's gonna pour into other parts of the car (fat is stored) to be used for later (and the car gets heavier). If you burn half the fuel in the car, the car's going to be heavier, but if you push the car and burn more fuel than you're putting in it's going to get lighter

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •