▲ 55 ▼ The Trade Deal (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) Oh it's you again. Last time we talked you lectured me about imperialism. I'm not really interested in a lecture today, or any day. We can have a conversation if you want, but I'm not going to subscribe to your dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sorry if I'm dismissive but I gotta tell you, last time we talked felt an awful lot like being lectured. You didn't really engage with anything I said but rather regurgitated endless theories and facts. And you are a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, is that not true? Subscribing to a particular narrative is IMO exactly what "dogmatic" means. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's truer than most dogmas. But still a dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] huquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Hello, is it me you're looking for? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] terrific@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) Oh it's you again. Last time we talked you lectured me about imperialism. I'm not really interested in a lecture today, or any day. We can have a conversation if you want, but I'm not going to subscribe to your dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sorry if I'm dismissive but I gotta tell you, last time we talked felt an awful lot like being lectured. You didn't really engage with anything I said but rather regurgitated endless theories and facts. And you are a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, is that not true? Subscribing to a particular narrative is IMO exactly what "dogmatic" means. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's truer than most dogmas. But still a dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] huquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Hello, is it me you're looking for? permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sorry if I'm dismissive but I gotta tell you, last time we talked felt an awful lot like being lectured. You didn't really engage with anything I said but rather regurgitated endless theories and facts. And you are a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, is that not true? Subscribing to a particular narrative is IMO exactly what "dogmatic" means. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's truer than most dogmas. But still a dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] terrific@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm sorry if I'm dismissive but I gotta tell you, last time we talked felt an awful lot like being lectured. You didn't really engage with anything I said but rather regurgitated endless theories and facts. And you are a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, is that not true? Subscribing to a particular narrative is IMO exactly what "dogmatic" means. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's truer than most dogmas. But still a dogma. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] terrific@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing". Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago Hello, is it me you're looking for? permalink fedilink source parent
