you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because they by running a business are responsible to ensure that they don't promote or willfully ignore harm brought about wholly or in part by their actions or negligence.

For actually moral folks the minimum the law requires is a starting point not the last word.

Eg moral folks ask is there anything I am doing that causes harm or anything I'm not doing that I reasonably ought to do to prevent it.

Smart people too as many governments take a dim view of dodging responsibly and will invent new laws to regulate you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    For actually moral folks the minimum the law requires is a starting point not the last word.

    Eg moral folks ask is there anything I am doing that causes harm or anything I'm not doing that I reasonably ought to do to prevent it.

    So... Like the payment processors banning all immoral transactions from their network? Is that what we're supporting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    No I'm supporting shut down of streaming channels that appear to show abuse or harm in a non functional context that is either non consentual or that no reasonable person would consent to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments