you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Android is Linux, and uses regular Linux security mechanisms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That's not the case. Android is extensively modified in order to have sandboxed applications only and restrictive hardware permissions.

    Run any executable on Linux. Likely by default it can access ~/Photos and the webcam. Android doesn't allow that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Flatpak?
    And some level of immutability?

    It doesn't seem like much of a step for Linux distros to cover the "gap" if/when we get any sort of viable mobile options for eg 1% of the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Flatpak has promise but the sandbox much weaker than Android. I wouldn't run anything untrusted with it as sandbox escapes are likely possible. Bubblewrap is highly portable at the cost of being less secure. Kernel level sandboxing such as SElinux and Namespaces are much more bulletproof since they leverage the kernel.

    Honestly if you are building something from the ground up I would instead focus on virtualization since the Linux kernel isn't exactly free of security issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "uses regular Linux security mechanisms" is true regardless of whether any distributions you use configure them the same way or not.

    The Android platform takes advantage of the Linux user-based protection to identify and isolate app resources.

    As part of the Android security model, Android uses Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) to enforce mandatory access control (MAC) over all processes, even processes running with root or superuser privileges (Linux capabilities).

    https://source.android.com/docs/security/features

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment