▲ 384 ▼ 4chan refuses to pay UK Online Safety Act fines, asks Trump admin to intervene (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by 0x0@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] sleen@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) Properly dealing with hate crimes is different from controlling the internet more or less in general. Let the internet be free, but also keep it free from hate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Keep it free from hate without controlling it? Who gets the ultimate say, then? The internet or the government? If your answer is "the government" how in the world does that work without controlling the internet? What government has successfully done this before? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I said I am torn here. Basically both sides are shit. I know this does not help. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago "Let it be free, but control it to keep this part out." That's literally what you're experiencing. You get to witness the flaw in the part where you don't get to pick the entity that decides which content doesn't belong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children) Properly dealing with hate crimes is different from controlling the internet more or less in general. Let the internet be free, but also keep it free from hate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Keep it free from hate without controlling it? Who gets the ultimate say, then? The internet or the government? If your answer is "the government" how in the world does that work without controlling the internet? What government has successfully done this before? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I said I am torn here. Basically both sides are shit. I know this does not help. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago "Let it be free, but control it to keep this part out." That's literally what you're experiencing. You get to witness the flaw in the part where you don't get to pick the entity that decides which content doesn't belong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Keep it free from hate without controlling it? Who gets the ultimate say, then? The internet or the government? If your answer is "the government" how in the world does that work without controlling the internet? What government has successfully done this before? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I said I am torn here. Basically both sides are shit. I know this does not help. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I said I am torn here. Basically both sides are shit. I know this does not help. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago "Let it be free, but control it to keep this part out." That's literally what you're experiencing. You get to witness the flaw in the part where you don't get to pick the entity that decides which content doesn't belong. permalink fedilink source parent