@arimelody.me on Bluesky: "web developers are getting too cocky. if visiting your `.png` URI doesn't give me the raw bytes of a png image and nothing else, your balls should explode  if you don't have balls, you grow balls that immediately explode"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Literally, I've had this happen on Fandom.com where I try to copy/save an image from a direct link that ends in ".png", but realize it was a fake PNG when I try to upload it. It's so annoying, IDK what the deal with all of these new image types is.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Basically since the Wikia rebrand to fandom, they've been owned by venture capital vultures, and have unsurprisingly dropped off. Stupid little nonsense like this doesn't surprise me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Fandom.com is bad. It sucks the fun out of every fandom wiki that it has in its clutches.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Use libredirect, or just manually replace fandom with breezewiki or some of the other helper sites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    IDK what the deal with all of these new image types is

    Well the reason is that all the old image files weren't designed for the modern web (some of them have been around since the 1960s) so these new image formats have been developed that compress more readily, and have additional features.

    I don't know the exact details but an example is that a lot of social media sites strip metadata from images because it takes up space, so some of these new formats have more compressed metadata so that's no longer needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment