So the argument is that's its ok to be reductive about your point, as long as it's in favor of your point.

Thank you for clearing that up.

Edit: I will be continuing this discussion with various emotionally charged grunts.

Debates tend to be less dumb when you actually know what you're talking about, so you should try that next time.

Do you want me to provide sources telling you that people starved, that the peasants rose up and executed their king in addition to a lot of other people during the french revolution?

God, wow. You do realize the king was condemned to execution by a vote at the National Convention after a long trial right? The peasants didn't execute their king; the sitting government did.

The French revolution was absolutely a class war with the under class literally overthrowing the ruling class and executing them with a guillotine,

Source? With sections and quotes, please. At the very least name one time period of the Revolution, because the Thermidorians definitely weren't executing the ruling class.