[–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah sure. Because as we all know, once a company has your money already, there’s nothing more important to them than making sure you continue to get the quality and security you already paid for already, in the past. They’re committed to you. Gigantic /S

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    And a text adventure!

    I had this idea to whip up a little TUI adventure game that takes you through a What’s New in Python 3.15. I present to you “whatsnewt”:

    From the README:

    A TUI text adventure through what’s new in Python 3.15. You wake up in the Startup Foyer, somewhere inside the interpreter, and work your way to the Release Gate. Along the way there are eighteen puzzles, and every one of them is a real 3.15 feature you have to actually use. You’re not just answering boring questions, you’re actually writing and running code, in a Python 3.15 interpreter. Some puzzles require a type checker, and in those cases, answers are verified by pyrefly, which is a dependency for exactly that reason, and the verdict quotes what it says back.

    The easiest way to play it is to run:

    uvx --python 3.15 whatsnewt

    And yes, there are easter eggs

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    PEP 686: Python now uses UTF-8 as the default encoding

    Finally Python arrived in 2026.

    PEP 810: Explicit lazy imports for faster startup times

    I like this. Curious to see how much it improves the perceived startup times.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It doesn't, since you're not repackaging or reselling. It's classical FUD as it is with any other license change in popular software. There already is a subscription. You already need the subscription for features even if you self host. The moment bitwarden pulls anything too greedy or suspicious there will be hard forks, and since vaultwarden already exists as a drop-in replacement for the official server, the API is well-known, those forks would be a massive problem for bitwarden as a company. Realistically, the single question is the same as it's been before the announcement: do you want to pay for comfort and to fund further official development, then go for bitwarden, or to use vaultwarden and self host it, and get more free features on your infra. OSS projects can pull fucky shit too, and die just like any other commercial product. You gotta trust someone.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Doesn't seem like upvotes or downvotes mean that much in Lemmy so who cares.

    Credit where it is due: that has been an absolutely superb design choice from the Lemmy developers.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So how does this affect someone like my situation I have the software installed on iOS and a few androids and a Linux. I have them all syncing using Bitwarden’s server (I know, I’m gonna change to self-hosted eventually). Do I have to find a new platform for my passwords?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Pretty soon we are gonna have AI hackers finding weaknesses - and likely doing as much damage as possible in the process - and AI security bots patching the exploits when they’re discovered, and in between all this chaos will be us, the obsolete humans, getting well and truly fucked in the mayhem.

    Anyone else see this coming besides me? So, all-y’all? Thought so.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Is it the old garbage video where they didn't even approach max RAM usage in either OS?

    checks crossposts

    It is the old garbage video. Their test system has plenty of RAM. Neither OS even approached saturation. Absolutely nothing meaningful can be gleaned from this video.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›