Dot name is a very weird one, but I'm glad it's grandfathered in and all remaining .name domain owners will be able to keep their domain name until they wither away.

Me! Me! Me!!

;)

Yes the AIs answers literally depend on useful databases of information and we need to be able to find sources including sources that aren't approved of by a tiny number of massive companies. Especially since AI sometimes just makes shit up.

AI:dr

The U.S. Is Driving Away Young Scientists

I think 200 sounds enough to be honest. I only hit limits when I'm doing some intense refactoring jobs and generally stuff that should rather be done by writing code that writes code.

Refactoring common patterns can often be done 90% by just writing a tool with the LLM instead of using the LLM to directly change something. Faster too

Hmm, at the very end it makes it sound like adware for my stack...

HolyArrs is free, but it isn't free to run. Every install talks to a metadata server I pay for every month. Sponsors cover that, and buy more hours for the things you vote for.

It baffles me howmany people take take AI slop at face value, and boast about it.

Either way, the men go in and the women want out. How many? It depends on how you define “working in AI.” About 71 percent of “AI-skilled workers,” according to one report, are men, and there are roughly 35,000 open AI roles in the US at any given moment. Broaden that to include investors and you’re adding thousands more. Broaden it further to include every man who has mentioned to his wife that he is “looking at some opportunities in the space”—and we’re in the millions.

Why is she so sweaty to make this a gendered thing? Women fall in love with chatbots every day.

There was nearly a riot when OpenAI made its ChatGPT more “cold” and “distant” from women who had fallen in love with it.

Any idea what their application would be that would make them pay this much? My workplace uses some for a big monitoring dashboard attached to a big TV..... But they could use an older R.Pi for that.

I'm so mad that this is "news" to people

Papier-maché code

I had Claude go through each occupation, compare it to O*Net as they did, and recode it, then had a separate agent go through and argue about which ones they had wrongly coded as not doable remotely.

So, you generated some random data that has absolutely no basis in fact, and proceeded to base a large portion of your argument on it. Wonderful.

AMD: "we're a datacenter company"

I think the top hackernews comment is probably right and this post itself is AI engagement farming, the user has their account set to hidden, it's very pointedly feeding into a narrative and telling people what they want to hear, and the writing style is AI-ish even if it doesn't have the more obvious tells.

We should figure out a way to donate such excess allowance to open source projects

That's what's balanced against "when it gets too expensive." This is basic economics. When one approach is too expensive you move to a less expensive one, then if the prices change and you're once again on the expensive one you move back again. The point is to have competition so that neither option can simply jack their prices up arbitrarily.

I'd love for his wife to get half of the speculation

He does actually “The system worked as intended. It gave me the position of the beep to within about 40cm, then I dug through that specific pile of boxes and found an ancient carbon monoxide detector that desperately wanted its batteries replaced.”

Given she manages their finances, getting half means losing half. Jensen wears the clothes his wife chooses for him and lives in the homes she keeps. She cuts him loose, she loses access to his half of their shared wealth.

My actual God, the "people" in that thread.

I read one reply that looks eerily similar to the shit my model answers with every day.

I like how I really don’t hear anything about Scott. Occasionally some charity will make the news about a windfall. She seems to be doing good.

I like the people who are all "when it gets too expensive, we'll just move on to self-hosting open weight models", as if that doesn't require having a fleet of GPUs running in the back room, or cloud compute in a data centre that will be charging a premium on cycles once everyone and their dog starts subscribing.