1
 
 

This post got over 50 comments a couple yrs ago:

https://linkage.ds8.zone/post/367822

Looking through the comments shows a strong bias in favor of centralization. Is it fair to say the masses in the fedi are merely anti-GAFAM? Considering how people pile onto a Cloudflare node (lemmy.world), the fedi is indeed mostly composed of those who do not resist network effect. Choosing the most evil node of a less evil network still reflects a problem.

We need to evolve more. We need a platform that does more to thwart centralized power. The network needs to build in a penalty for disproportionately large nodes w/a single point of influence. And there should be a built-in mitgating mechanism to keep Cloudflare out, as Cloudflare is inherently centralized to the most abusive extent.

2
 
 

Rimu recently started a new rant thread. I copied the response of the person they had targeted and in less than a minute Rimu had deleted the comment.

This is the comment Rimu did not want people being able to see:
https://feddit.uk/post/53824748/26875911

This is the thread I shared it on:
https://feddit.uk/post/53824747

3
 
 

I have images disabled in my browser and also in my profile. So I should only be getting text when browsing a Lemmy server, and it should be compressed because TLS is in play and compression is usually/conventionally done before encryption (or so I thought). Animated GIFs are immune to my settings but I did not notice any.

After a couple(?) hours of activity involving mostly reading and writing and not a crazy amount of searching or jumping around, my session consumed ~65mb. That seems like a lot for just text. Hi-res binary images are often around 1 mb, so it seems a bit off that my text-only session would use the equivalent of 65 hi-res pics.

To give an idea of sizes, I have a text file holding 260 of my posts going back several months. The uncompressed size is 558k. It seems very unlikely that I would have read that many posts/comments in 2 hours. So 65mb is at least 2 orders of magnitude more bandwidth consumption than I would expect.

With probably 95+% of fedi ppl on quasi unlimited broadband, probably no one pays attention to this.

Any theories? I had a few different accounts open from different nodes. So I wonder if the JavaScript client code is where all the fat is, which must be fetched upon every single login. Would the stock Lemmy client code be as big as 10mb compressed? A few nodes have some kind of anti-bot thing that runs. I wonder if that has some network fat.

4
 
 

I’ve not studied the ActivityPub protocol much, and certainly not examined the voting API. My question for those who have:

Is it possible or easy for a platform to suppress downvotes from users who have not first satisfied either of these preconditions:

  • created a comment in the thread being downvoted; OR
  • upvoted a comment in the thread being downvoted

?

And perhaps more complex, cancel the downvotes of cheaters who would circumvent the above policy by making a temporary dummy comment, downvoting, then deleting the dummy.

Voting is a shit-show on Lemmy. I wonder to what extent the ActivityPub API is the culprit or if it’s an implementation specific problem.

5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/40188039

Archived

Left-wing extremists have been showing "substantial activity on Lemmygrad.ml" with an accompanying increase in toxicity, a new joint study published by Binghamton University and Cyprus University of Technology on Arxiv says.

The researchers also identified posts that support authoritarian regimes, endorse the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and feature anti-Zionist and antisemitic content.

"Overall, our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of political extremism within decentralized social networks and emphasize the necessity of analyzing both ends of the political spectrum in research," the researchers conclude.

[...]

Users on Lemmygrad.ml frequently discuss [...] China and North Korea, with many posts expressing support for them.

[...]

Discussions [on Lemmygrad.ml] on the Israel-Palestine conflict primarily criticize Israel. While many posts condemn antisemitism, [the authors] also encounter numerous posts that extend beyond criticizing Israel, displaying anti-Zionism and even antisemitism.

[...]

[The study] results show that users of Lemmygrad.ml frequently share posts that support authoritarian regimes, as seen in their support for China, North Korea, and Russia. Moreover, their support can extend beyond backing these authoritarian regimes, even cheering on their violent actions, as evidenced by their posts on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Additionally, we observe anti-Zionist and antisemitic behaviors, which show similarities to right-wing extremism.

[...]

Our analysis suggests a concerning endorsement of authoritarian actions and extremist rhetoric on Lemmygrad.ml, further indicating that left-wing extremist communities on decentralized platforms should receive more attention from the academic community.

[...]