[–] 1 point 2 months ago

A few people at work keep complaining about pay but always do it in comparisons. Like "my role was advertised for 3k more than I am on" when talking about an advert that closed ages ago and I didn't see.

I'll tell anyone exactly how much I am on with the most bare minimum of prompting or mention of pay.

The people complaining most are in roles that from what I can tell require a lot more than mine and I get the impression the pay increase isn't as much as it should be. For my role specifically I feel fine. For theirs I would want like +10k minimum and I wonder if its more like +2k.

Or take it to get the role in my job history and start looking for a similar role somewhere else fairly quickly. Hey, I think I know why the last guy left so soon...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    The ones organizing the best. You can see that with unions, politics and a lot of other things. Falling number of people of working age can be dealt with somewhat by forcing people to work. Any way to fight it or even reduce working time per person, by a shorter work week, earlier retirement or even work day helps. Obviously it also depends on industry and global competition. However it currently looks like the system of globalization is splitting up a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    While all three are good policies to have, they aren't enough to make people want to have babies as demonstrated by birth rates in most countries that have them. It turns out that raising a human properly is a lot of work and a lot of responsibility, not to say that it requires women to go through pregnancy and childbirth, both exhausting and potentially traumatic events. If we are to raise birth rates, we need to offer way more than just this bare minimum.

    Changing our societal structure to encourage communal child raising so that responsibility doesn't fall fully on young inexperienced parents would be one potential step. Developing tools to help women go through pregnancy and childbirth more easily would be another.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The key part about this is that this is going to shrink the supply of labour faster then the demand. All the old factories and so forth will still be around. So this strengthens the position of workers against the capital. We also will keep a lot of the old infrastructure. In Western Europe, where we have long term financial data going back centuries, there have been two periods of the wealth gap closing. One was after the Black Death and the other after WW2. In both cases there was a lot of death shrinking the labour force.

    The other key part is that this is already happening. There was a peak in births in 1990 with 143.5million globally. After that it fell for a bit to then hit another peak in 2012 with 146.1million. Current UN projects are that that will be the peak in the foreseeable future.

    This is why the leadership class is talking about birth rates so much. They are worried about their power.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    FWIW,

    wp:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

    The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT[A]) is an environmental movement that calls for all people to abstain from reproduction in order to cause the gradual voluntary extinction of humankind. VHEMT supports human extinction primarily because it would prevent environmental degradation. The group states that a decrease in the human population would prevent a significant amount of human-caused suffering. The extinctions of non-human species and the scarcity of resources caused by humans are frequently cited by the group as evidence of the harm caused by human overpopulation.

    ...

    VHEMT rejects government-mandated human population control programs in favor of voluntary population reduction,[2] supporting only the use of birth control and willpower to prevent pregnancies.[3] Knight states that coercive tactics are unlikely to permanently lower the human population, citing the fact that humanity has survived catastrophic wars, famines, and viruses.[10]

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    growth is connected to progression. the story of how next generation will be better. but the betterment is promised through material imcrease. more roads, more swimming pools, greater sporting events, better standards, faster internet.

    futurism is the contract of progression. it faithfully promises us flying cars, moon travel, eradication of cancer, the end of poverty, zero pollution plains, hyper realistic simulations, green growth cities. maybe not now, but eventually.

    it is a religion of progression. the decentralized religion of the machine. adapting to the temperature of the people. studying the people to figure how to manage them.

    but the machine only works through people. it is the people that let themselves become coggs.

    humans are like elements; we can be fire or water. as fire we destroy, as water we flow. as water we become the ocean, as fire we disrupt, we become great, everybody will remember us. but nothing will be left. we can choose to be or not to be.

    so why would we choose not to be? why would we choose fire when water keeps us afloat? it is because they dont see they are hurting themselves. they dont see how the fires will engulf everything.

    water shows how letting be remediates the world. turning us away from the competing, the machine; towards the samworking, samliving, samholding, humanity.

    our task is therefore to turn fire into water

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That's the only valid use for those crappy meta glasses — hack them, cut them from the internet and install a real life adblock on them. Should be awesome.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Almost all of what is covered there are simply store names. There are many small stores in that street ... Oh, and the sign in the middle, which is covered, is merely spelling out the name of the street.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›