[–] [S] 1 point 2 days ago

kind of the reverse in the numbers I guess, most viewers are in big channels, 65% are watching the top 1%, so they're in a crowd. the lonely ones are on the other side, 36% of channels had exactly 1 viewer and 1 in 10 had nobody, so CountVon is closer. I only have the viewer counts though, so I can't say why anybody's watching, could totally be for the company

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    Isnt this kind of obvious? Youtube reviewers often get the product for free and will rarely ever use it after reviewing it. Normal owners will use it until it breaks and then report that on reddit. Only enthusiasts will report something working well.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    Given that astroturfing is rampant on Reddit, I wouldn't be surprised if product breakdowns are more common than even the Reddit comments would on average let on.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    i don’t believe in that constant of the german numbers, seems to me that they just estimate the same every year and don’t really bother to update their methodology. just as they count feminicides…

  • source
  • view more: next ›