I break Rules 2 and 6 constantly
Rule 2: No Trolling
Rule 6: Be civil in comments. This includes instance shaming.
I do this to rage bait .world libs because it's hilarious, but then they get banned for Rules 3, 4, and 6 before I can really get into pissing them off.
Rule 3: No liberalism
Rule 4: Lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes.
Addressing this upfront because it makes no sense: I am not opposed to banning trolls. I am opposed to banning trolls before I have finished trolling them. These are two entirely different positions, and conflating them is a fundamental misunderstanding of my argument.
Grasping at straws, my only guesses are:
-
(Charitably) The moderators don't understand that trolling is a process, and that banning someone before I've finished is effectively depriving me of the opportunity to complete that process.
-
(Less-than-charitably) They understand perfectly well what they're doing and simply don't care about my personal entertainment.
The act alone of banning someone I was enjoying arguing with- without any consideration for my personal entertainment- is enough to warrant this post.
I believe that the woke right should only be banned after I'm done having fun with them, or I should be banned with them to spare me from this recurring annoyance.
What I'd like most, though, is to bring this abuse out in the open, because this is clearly the norm for this website.
I compiled this post because I had a sneaking suspicion the moderators would continue banning people I wanted to argue with, and wanted a means to defend myself from a one-sided narrative in which I am apparently expected to stop trolling people when they get banned (they usually don't respond to my DMs when I try to keep the thread going)
