[–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

But it does not necessarily suggest that bots of the kind that post on social media have reduced their activity, or that there has been any meaningful result in the amount of misinformation or general posts from such accounts. While some users have reported that they are seeing less of those posts and accounts, that is not necessarily broadly true and may have nothing to do with the attacks on Yandex.

That is because Cloudflare’s “bot” data measures traffic from non-human, automated sources in general. And those kinds of bots can be used for all purposes, both good and bad.

As such, those widely shared charts do not in themselves suggest that there will be any less activity from automated systems that post on social media. And there is nothing necessarily to suggest that the attacks have had any impact in that way at all.

Users report less malicious bot activity, but you know, there's no evidence of less malicious bot activity, because non-malicious bots exist, you see.

What a waste of time the article is

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Help Ukraine. Already helping? Help more! You see the positive results even if you're far from frontline. A few coins in your country might not be enough to buy a sausage, but can improve the life of Ukrainian soldier, who already helps you! Russia is the source of global problems(yes, in Africa too). Many governments are afraid to raise their voices about fires in the factories and warehouses, sunk ships (Bulgaria, Türkiye?). But if Ukraine lose, you will receive even more frightening problems.

    Oh, and Belarus is a pile of shit too. Watch them.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    Their 25 year history of resistance included multiple instances of server seizures, among other things. A little knowledge of their history would tell you this was hardly the "first sign of any authoritarian action".

    The pressure they've stood up to in the past suggests they may have been facing threats this time that go beyond what has been widely publicised.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    That's easily said as someone not sanctioned by the US, but consider that they're still humans with lives. You can't expect people to suddenly give up their and their families' abilities to live a normal life to fight a foreign fascist regime. Huge respect if they do. But I haven't done it and presumably neither have you, so we really shouldn't judge.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    We cannot engage in a fight or expose ourselves to manipulations that threaten the lives of these people and their loved ones

    That's exactly what they were hoping for.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago*

    uhhhhhh, that's exactly how Canadian Centre for Child Protection identified the seeded output came from a stored model…
    you can't have a modeller without original trained data, otherwise a diffusion wouldn't take place…

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    child protection organizations frequently give those illegal materials a kind of digital fingerprint – known as a hash – which allows them to track images and videos when they appear online.

    In this case, attorneys for the plaintiff stated that the Canadian Centre for Child Protection used images’ fingerprints to identify AI-generated CSAM on X that depicted their client.

    Bullshit detected! Those hashes are literally data checksums. So they can't be used to identify anything but the exact same original image!

  • source
  • view more: next ›