I’m an AI user, where’s my money?

While I was actually looking for someone to break my model with a better one with better info, this is a pretty useless argument.

To get money, you need to:

1. make some half-baked product with chutzpah
2. Use charisma to get others to vibe with it on a social media platform
   • this is easy if you know how to do the social acting that "normies" do
3. Appeal to the ones in power, while convincing them that you used AI to make it, will be using more AI and will do some subscription stuff
4. Find a way to inherit Venture Capital.

IDK really, perhaps you can use a book.
I mainly did it in the 8085 practicals during B.Tech and they had a handy learning kit with a HEX keyboard so we could Assemble it manually on paper, write the program directly to a given RAM address and then run it from there. For ARM, we just used Keil µVision.
Now I just download an x64 instruction manual or just look up the instructions on the web, on the occasional requirement of reading disassembly.

I don't recommend starting with x86_64 reference. While it can be used just fine, it has lots of instructions and and you instead want a very small subset of them.

Also, there will be a great difference between using an OS and not doing so, as going with one, then includes a lot of potential boilerplate.

I ask to call even if the other side is one that never going to and will call with another no. after I save their no.

Wasn't that also the case for Syphilis?

I'm not particularly interested in human meat, but who am I to stop you?

You need to realise that China is not every Chinese person.
Their govt. harasses their own people too.

If they are spraying our fishing boats with water cannons and we go spray their fishing boats with water cannons, we just fall into playing their game and doing what they want.

Our govts. need to capture the ones that are spraying the fishing boats, instead of capturing fishing boats.

By "little guy", I mean the grunt workers, which in this case, are the fishing boats in both the countries. No govt. is a "little guy" in my books. Definitely not one that can afford a Police and a military.

Yeah. The current job market shows a different trend.

With people saying "people using AI will replace people not using AI".
And the reason for that is not because people using AI will produce better work, but because AI usage will be preferred over usable output.

And because the flow of money is such that all those having money can easily choose to give most of it to AI users^[with the only exception being base material products like agricultural produce, which has a much lower margin and their costs again go to AI users] while non-AI users don't have the same ability once most providers turn to AI use.

Now as long as you get the Governments on board (they are already buying up GPUs too) you can get all taxes into AI use, hence starving the non-AI market of ability to procure computing hardware (or anything else to work on) and that is how you get AI supremacy without providing anything better.

I have not played after 2.
Can you tell me what this would mean?

Wait until a bread costs a million.

Shebang #!

Well, that's right too.
But I'd rather say they harass the military insurgents, although they won't for fear of quick escalation.

So now you have Chinese military ships harassing Japanese fishers in Japanese waters and then Japanese military harassing possibly illegal Chinese fishermen, which China will then try to use for publicity.

It's originally pronounced "cute" as that also prevents confusion with QT (Apple QuickTime).
Due to everyone around me (physically) calling it Q.T., I have picked that up too. And then companies creating JDs write it down as QT, making me cringe every time.
Thankfully, QuickTime is mostly not in use, meaning that anyone really posting for it would most probably use its full form, so I can know that Qt is referring to Qt.