[–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Their repositories are really something, and the commits seem to only happen in bursts, I expected them to do a few commits every day, instead it's like 10 days a year with 1700+ commits total.

But I wouldn't assume they are conventionally malicious, more like a paperclip storage optimiser

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    To be honest, I didn't read through, because of all the flourishing and humourous wordy descriptions.

    It feels unbalanced and leaning towards comedy, but jokes were not supposed to become the only reason to read that, were they?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Also, create a thousand accounts in advance at random days, never use them and make this comment their only, but when account is not fresh. That way it would look like it's a legitimate reader that was just once so outraged they decided to comment and then shut up forever

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    I'm not a 100% sure it does, the choice of symbols looks a bit suspicious but it could be independently invented from ColorAdd idea like the one you linked. Symbolism is hard to standardise, maybe a chevron for blue has another meaning for the author

    Edit: or more realistically, they had this problem and decided to solve it with AI and publish their solution for everyone without checking if the solution already existed and was partially copied by AI. That's the feeling I get from the repository at least

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›