[–] 30 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Correction: They think distributing their IP without permission is a violation of their copyrights (which is true).

"Theft" is not a thing when it comes to copyright. Every time someone uses "theft" to describe copyright infringement, the MPAA, RIAA, Microsoft, EPIC, Sony, and Disney all have a little orgasm and layoff another worker that created that IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I'm not misrepresenting anything. If you take any model and just change the temperature a little bit (it's a setting that controls the influence of the RNG) you can have wildly different output.

    Different AI providers using the exact same model will have outputs so different using the same exact prompts you'd think they were in different universes.

    They absolutely do not "have the same hallmarks."

    This stuff is benchmarked to absurd degrees every time a new model comes out. Just look it up already! You're so obviously arguing from an ignorant position it's silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)
    1. They do not all write the same. There's benchmarks for this and if you just do a basic search or actually test them yourself you'll see that their output differs wildly. Not only between vendors, but been versions of the same model. For example, Claude stopped using em dashes for most output for a while but now they've come back.
    2. There's vastly more than "a handful of models"! Are you living under a rock‽ Go to HuggingFace today and then again tomorrow. There's going to be a dozen new ones! Probably more!
    3. Changing the back end configuration even a tiny bit can vastly change the output of a model.
  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›