[–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Aucun parti ne peut vraiment être 100% aligné avec tes intérêts. Personnellement la question souverainiste/fédéraliste vient bien loin après tous les problèmes écologiques, racistes, sociaux, et économiques, alors j'ai voté QS même si leur nationalisme m'emmerde.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Le Monde Diplomatique? I also second the recommendation to diversify your sources: no single news source will let you know what's "really" going on

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That people voted against it is no evidence that it's a horrible idea. The article to which you reply at least tries to provide a bit of evidence for its argument. Also, I don't need a parliament that's "efficient" (whatever that can mean. Do you measure that in number of pages of new laws passed per months?), I need one that's fair and democratic. Wht has been happening sine the "liberals" got the majority is evidence enough for me that we should avoid non-coalitions as much as we can.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Actually, "is it encrypted" is just the tip of the iceberg: it's all too easy to encrypt in a way that does not provide security against the threats the users want to defend. E.g. maybe the answer to this question is "yes" because the connection is over https, yet the server sees and stores the data in the clear

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Il me semble que de nos jours le désir indépendantiste n'est rien de plus qu'une opposition au gouvernement canadien actuel exacerbé par une rancoeur tirée d'iniquités passées. C'est malheureusement compatible autant avec le fascisme que l'antifascisme.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›