[–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think they have a professional offering. You can give them a bit of your money to have a proper branding as you like, or just remove it. The cost-free version is not primarily meant for commercial use. Just stop thinking a company is non-commercial.

It is simply stupid if the companies prejudge a project in such a way, although there would be an offer for them, which is made especially for commercial projects.

Edit: but I see that there are not very much advantages when a project does it like they do at Anubis.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Then point out that their way of thinking is unprofessional without saying so directly. That’s what I would do, at least.

    There is a way to use something like Anubis without having to deal with the image. But you need to handle it professionally.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    Interesting read. Many web applications today rely on client-side rendering, which can perform poorly. Why should users wait several seconds for a page to download, only to wait several more while it renders? In my case, I often have to enable JavaScript and reload the page because I block unknown JavaScript by default.

    Another problem is when a web app aggressively probes for information such as installed extensions, as LinkedIn does. That can make the site laggy and practically unusable. But I suppose we could consider that malware anyway.

  • source
  • view more: next ›