This is not the argument clinic.
You said non-humanoid is a broad description like it's a negative. It's not. Fixating on making the robot humanoid unnecessarily narrows it down. Form and function are by definition not the same, so I don't understand what you mean by that. But I'm got going to stop because it seems.you're intentionally obtuse.
Yes that's the whole point. They're forcibly thinking in humanoid forms, while I dont care about form, I care about function. Make shit that's useful, and I dont care what package it comes in. In the vast majority of use cases it's incredibly cumbersome to have it in bipedal form; you to have reserve cpu power/mechanics/power for balance and shit, while not at all necessary for the tasks at hand.
Non-humanoids can theoretically do that too.
Why do they keep insisting on humanoid? Just give me the crushinator to do chores for $10,000.
If it's Russian windows I'd at least expect a wallpaper of a guy being autodefenestrated by some dark figure.
They better secure it properly. Some people tried to steal this cat statue at Purmerend station within 3 weeks after it was placed: https://www.nhnieuws.nl/nieuws/356224/eindelijk-krijgt-hij-zn-plekje-stationskat-brammetje-vereeuwigd-in-purmerend
You're assuming it's nonconsensual.
Sex before the first date.
Systemd
*grabs popcorn*
Nah man, piece of shit software; Sometimes it just lists some random directory contents.
'Fun' fact: the US company (Kyndryl) blocked from taking over the Dutch digital identity provider (for about 100 million euro) because it was deemed a security risk, still has Defence contracts with the Netherlands in excess of 2 billion euro (project GrIT).