Id say: i dont have anything to hide, but some people do and I like to support them. Like people with autism for example. They shouldn't have to hide anything, but every now and then people in power use different groups of people as scapegoats to advance their agenda

Edit: typo

Makes sense if Republicans control how controversial something sounds. We should investigate which political direction the owners of main stream media leans

I have a different perspective. No one are higher in the social hierarchy than the king. The fact that no one can buy themselves an equal or higher standing is valuable. When the king, like our line of kings, choose to ground themselves, to lift up the value of the ones on the bottom, it sets precedent for other "high status individuals". It generates stigma for over-indulgence when even the king will abstain. That is if they do their part. Which is the tradition of kings in Norway.

I'm negative to monarchy in general, but in Norway's case it works. Signed fellow Norwegian

This generates more incentive for the politicians to keep the people poor. The poorer the people are, the cheaper winning a vote is since less money will be enough motivation to sway them

70 more years now and they'll understand that the whole socialism thing actually makes sense as well. Just like taking paying and taking care of your workers actually results in higher and longer production

In this dysfunctional world going straight to hell, Harald was a voice of reason and love

This was me when I was younger. I turned it around by using simple social queues. In a group, if a friend I trusted was making jokes on my expense I'd laugh. However, if someone else I didn't trust/ accept would do the same (as often happened), I'd just stare at them with a neural expression. Maybe even a bit annoyed. Social situations are ball games. They all want to play ball. If you dont play ball, they will try to adapt so that you throw the ball back

This is only an argument if one values democracy, which the voters of Trump clearly does not

When things feel overwhelmingly big I usually refactor. The answer for me is usually folder by feature. Refactoring should be a natural part of the engineering cycle. You've learned a lot while getting to the point you are, and the structure reflects the outdated perspective.

Also don't go out of your way to reuse logic. It's a lot cheaper to adjust code that only has one dependency. If the duplication starts hurting, then consider converging. I usually start writing how I'd like to use the new code, then implement it to fit.

Hope my two cents helped

Cost of doing business

A shame. That sign hit me straight in the feelings

Is there going to be a class action lawsuit against this? If they'd have told me that I wasn't allowed to install apps of my choosing on the phone I was about to buy, I never would have bought it. Them changing the terms two years down the line seems criminal