If your code is already in a Git repository, the simplest solution would be to use statichost, which has a free plan. It works on the same principle as Netlify, where your site is updated when you push the code.
This is a very technical way to self-host, and I feel there are easier ways to go about it. Is your end goal to be able to upload a website but avoid big tech platforms?
I wonder if we’ll end up in a situation of open source projects with closed source tests. Though I don’t know how that would work, because how would you contribute a new feature if the tests are closed? 🤔
Check against Can I Use, all of the APIs, except for the following are supported by major browsers:
- Synchronous Clipboard API only Safari has full support, the rest have partial
- Temporal only currently supported in Chrome and Firefox
The fact that people even bring javascript as the backend is a bit crazy to me.
To clarify do you mean replacing JavaScript just on the backend? This article is about using JavaScript on the front end.
I'm intrigued, what would you replace it with?
What are your thoughts on this 2023 comparison?
So to confirm, you don't trust blogs where the company is selling a product or service, even if they don't mention it in the article? If so, that would cover a lot of articles shared on this instance.
For what? I don't see any products or services being promoted in this article.
People who care about performance are using loops
Well that depends, generators are faster than loops when you're using Bun or Node.
However in this case the opposite is true, as Chromium currently doesn't support this feature.
Do you mean features only currently available in Chrome?