"i love you bro".

something to let him know you support him and he can rely on you. definitely nothing apologetic or mournful, this isn't a bad thing.

if he's cool you could go with "duh" or "makes sense" or to quote my wife "I could have told you that".

we were mandated to double our output to justify what the company is spending on Claude and to do so we were told to use god awful skills that are constructed in a way that often ignore guide rails and bypass permission rules causing more time to be wasted in debugging and fixing shitty ai slop than would have been spent actually by humans planning and implementing sound changes.

this may not be for everyone nor actionable, but I managed to raw-dog ADHD for years by having dependents (small children and pets) that need cared for.

before you spend too much time looking, i use their online store, I don't know if they are in physical stores anywhere, I've never seen it on shelves.

if you are in the US (maybe Candada too?) I really like Harney and son's tea.

I've seen some trash human written stories and confluence pages. it is going to hilarious to the the slop generated based on those.

curious (well not really) that it is only consumer grade. nothing about business grade, of even a deliniation as to where "pro-sumer" falls. if this is a big brother situation then the consumer only thing makes perfect sense. it also drives users back to isp supplied hardware which means more rental fees, so more money CEOs.

I was only on steroids once and I hated it. I felt like I was losing my mind and my fingers tingled like I was about fire lightning out of them. hopefully your experience goes better.

while you very well could be correct, there is probably another angle where the intent is to prevent someone from slapping on a bunch of salvaged panels to hide underlying structural flaws in order to keep an unsafe vehicle off the streets. since we are given very few good alternatives to cars in much of the state, I'd rather know I can trust the machine driving next to me even if I can't trust the operator.

That shouldn't even be classified as violence since it is a response to actions that are a direct threat to life.

Whichever has the most candy. I'll tolerate a lot for an amount of candy that I'll regret eating.

As an old-head full stack developer who prefers back end because there is no ux, just information flow, I can tell you that you are seen.

Something like a survey that asks me to assess whether I agree or disagree on a scale of 1-5 fills me with so much anxiety, especially when the question is worded in such a way that makes me feel like it contradicts its sentiment, or just doesn't apply to me. Why can't they just give me a separate not applicable option.