I actually like Rust too, and I’m not against it; however, C is currently the best-known programming language in the world. Still, I like your idea.

Yes, you are absolutely right. Regardless of how proficient an LLM (large language model) might be at documentation and coding, it remains just that—an LLM. If you write the documentation yourself, you can craft it in a way that is both engaging and humorous. I am not suggesting that we should avoid using LLMs altogether; I simply believe they should be used with moderation.

People used to say the same things about the Linux kernel, but its current state is actually quite good. In other words, C is a standard and robust language.

We used to enjoy using Proton, but over time, it began to resemble a large, impersonal corporation. Moves like the introduction of a "workspace" plan or tendencies toward monopolization are clear indicators of this. Switching to Disroot—a far superior alternative—has been invaluable for us; Disroot truly values ​​its users. Although they are experiencing some issues at the moment, it’s not a major concern—every system encounters problems from time to time, and we are fully confident that these will be resolved soon. We highly recommend Disroot as an alternative to Proton; it is, in a word, a fantastic service.

This could be a great idea; it’s a thousand times better than using LLVM.

We understand you perfectly well; Rust is fine, too, but no language can take the place of C. I mean, wouldn't it have been better if it had been written in C?

Wouldn't it be great to master a language like C while also grasping the logic behind other programming languages? I’m not entirely against artificial intelligence, but it’s completely useless—it’s absolute garbage.