This sounds like a situation where the club needs to be explicitly neurodivergent and leftist. There is a group that I run into every week when I take my kid to dance. They operate a neurodivergent game night, and it's a very diverse crowd of people (spectrum wise). From what I can tell (and from speaking with the person who runs it), it's a very inclusive space for people all over the spectrum. As a neurodivergent person myself, I get what you're saying. This club is frankly the first space I've seen like it, but to be fair, I also wasn't seeking it out, so maybe there are more. The BPP was Black and Marxist. I would even argue it was Black first and Marxist second. I think what you're talking about could be handled in the same way: Neurodivergent first, and Leftist second. I wouldn't doubt there are people who have neurodivergence who still harbor and act on normative bounds, reinforcing normative social rules in what should be non-normative spaces. Those people shouldn't be running these groups.
One thing I think is a good place to start is building social connections. I think there could be a lot of space in reviving the left-wing social club. The average US citizen is extremely isolated, and one way we can fight against that isolation is finding ways to rebuild that social network we've lost. I'm talking about building clubs where the socialist perspective dominates but isn't always the focus.
I mean, I could just rattle off a list here, just off the top of my head:
- Parenting clubs
- Sporting clubs
- Reading groups
- Health clubs or neurodivergent & disabled support groups
- Wilderness clubs
- Gaming clubs
I think we can also draw inspiration from sources like the survival programs of the BPP for example.
Okay, let’s actually read past the headline and look at what the article itself admits versus what it wants you to believe.
First, the “schools are being shut down and kids are abandoned” narrative. The article buries the fact that Gangjong Grassland Girls' School (one of the three “closed” schools) was already a government-affiliated institution with a curriculum following the state system. So the “closure” is a restructuring of an already integrated school, not the sudden eradication of an independent Tibetan institution.
Second, the “where did the children go?” question. RFA doesn’t tell you. But public reporting does: Golog has 63 boarding schools where rural students get free accommodation, food, and tuition. The reason is geographic. Golog is at an average altitude above 4,000 meters with scattered pastoral populations; daily commuting is not realistic. Boarding is voluntary, decided by parents and students, and kids go home on weekends and holidays. This is logistics, not a plot.
Third, the “language is being erased” claim. The article cites an “expert” saying kids will be forced into Chinese-only schools. Here’s the actual data from Xizang (Tibet): there are over 30,000 bilingual teachers, and the number of full-time Tibetan language teachers grew from 5,800 in 2018 to nearly 8,300. Tibetan language is a core compulsory subject, and in Chamdo, about 94% of ethnic Tibetan students take the Tibetan language exam for college entrance. If that’s “erasure,” it’s the most incompetent erasure campaign in history.
Fourth, the “Ethnic Unity Law is a weapon against Tibetan” line. The law that RFA says is the legal cover for closing schools explicitly states the state shall “encourage all ethnic groups to appreciate each other’s exceptional traditional cultures, and learn each other’s languages and scripts.” That’s Article 29, in black and white. RFA’s “researcher” either didn’t read the law or hopes you won’t.
Fifth, the new schools are invisible in this article. The same month RFA claims schools are vanishing, a brand-new Golog-Xining Ethnic High School (built with paired assistance from Shanghai) was operating with nearly 1,000 students, mostly from herding families. Earlier, the Golog Middle School in Xining received 122 million yuan in investment, largely funded by Shanghai. These aren’t secret facts. They just don’t fit the “cultural genocide” template.
So the next time you see “China closes Tibetan schools,” ask the questions RFA didn’t answer: Were the schools already government-run? Where did the students go? Are there more Tibetan-language teachers now than before? The answers usually make the headline look less like journalism and more like a press release for a very specific political agenda.
Is this some kind of ploy to try and find some "Voting is always good" counter point, that voting in and of itself is democracy and having that is better then nothing? Which is why you seem to be implying that the system doesn't need to justify itself, that if the system didn't do that it would still function and people would still participate, because it is, after all, "Democracy"?
Quit beating around the bush and just say what you mean instead of being a coy annoyance.
Why? Are you looking for someone to read it for you?
I definitely thought the right wing was gonna help Palestines
You're right about one thing. Harris is part of the right wing.
Why do all these liberal projects have such authoritarian, dictatorial measures baked into their source code? 
Why is it that the "tankies" building Lemmy have not hard coded their software with similar dictatorial, authoritarian measures? 
I guess we'll never know.
You can read the bible in China.
Feel free to explain to the class how you are not in a cult.
StarTrek is cool and good!





In a historic vote, 75% of Senate Democrats backed an effort to block weapons to Israel. The resolutions failed, but the vote was the latest sign of Democrats' growing consensus against aid to Israel, as support for the country hits an all-time low.





