If they really cared they'd just have some big warning if the all is from an "unverified" developer. It's all about control.
I'm going to wait on the outcome of these lawsuits and the discovery process before I lean one way or the other.
I am once again here to remind that these LLMs are statistical models, the only "meltdown" was said model by chance outputting something negative, then reinforced on that in it's context window.
I helped my mom with her windows install when the update half a year ago nuked keyboard support (I had to use the onscreen keyboard just to login). Before thar I had to forcefully install the correct wifi driver as well to get it working properly. This is was running from their factory installation. Stuff working correctly out of the box is a problem on both platforms.
To your first comment about incompatible anticheat - in must cases it's a conscious decision the publisher makes. Are We Anti-Cheat Yet it's a good resource. Personally I find my OS preventing me from being able to run a privacy invading rootkit to be a pro as well.
To the second comment, a good amount of games bench better on Linux, not sure what's going on with his system so I agree.
Definitely unfortunate to see a creator publishing content without first doing some research but that's more and my common nowadays.
When all else fails, get Termux and just run the commands manually / setup some scripts.
My sister got one of these. It was so fun discovering that her fine was timestamped to seconds into the lowered speed limit timeframe. Basically if the sign starts flashing warning you about the reduced speed, it's already too late for you.
I find the unnecessarily complex argument a little odd. Third party ecosystems and individual libraries can be unnecessarily complex, especially when they're heavily opinionated. But I've performance never encountered a language I found "unnecessarily" complex. Do you have a few examples and what in particular you consider unnecessarily complex?
There's been malware in the past, not only that - AUR is user submitted. It's in the name. They warn you to double check what you're installing. It is functionally similar to running a random installer you found on GitHub.
It seems like these instances are being intentionally blown out of proportion, but I don't see what there is to gain by doing that.
I'm guessing Arkangel
A child in South Carlonina
Ah yes, the famous Carlonina