[–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Adjustment on bullet one. We shouldn't say they "raise" the chance, they are correlated with the increase. There has been no causal path suggested that I'm aware of. It's a hard distinction if your not used to the concept, but it's important.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Honestly, that is awesome! Absolutely try things. Seeing what works and doesn't is a great way to learn. The sneaky thing about hiding is that it works great until it fails utterly. (Security through obscurity.) I'm sure everyone who says "don't do that" says it because they left some random thing open once and it was a disaster. (I lost a private wiki with all my notes back in the day.)

    Keep at it. ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure what you mean by non-spying, but you should be prepared for anything you put on the Internet to be poked by any number of people that you do not want poking. If whatever you are hosting would be compromised by having a DNS name, you might want to rethink your security plan.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I'm going to go with "nothing". They blend their numbers but I'd be willing to bet the amount of money they make selling direct licenses is tiny. (Tiny at their scale, I'd take it any day.) The whole OEM business isn't even huge to them. If they start losing the enterprise market, then I'm sure they would throw down, but you and everyone you know installing Linux would be fine. Have you noticed how easy it is to steal windows and how there seem to be very few repercussions? That says volumes about what they think the revenue potential of that market is..

  • source
  • view more: next ›