A few days ago I watched this video by wired about the pyramids in Egypt
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enMPLaB1oEo), and something interesting that the expert talks about is that they know exactly where the stones come from- not only is there clear evidence of quarrying in the immediate vicinity, but the dimensions match and they even have contemporary records describing the movement of stone blocks from quarries across the river to the construction site. (2 day round trip.)

Granted it's a Wired video so she didn't go into an overly extraordinary level of detail, but in any case it reminded me of a lecture I attended about 15 years ago when I went a prospective students/parents night at a prestigious university that I was looking to attend.

As part of the presentation, they had this guy give a lecture on his groundbreaking new theory that the pyramids were actually cast in place, rather than quarried. I thought it was interesting at the time, so when I heard about this quarry stuff in the Wired video, I assumed it must be a relatively recent discovery.

Nope! People have literally known about these quarries since ancient times, and they were confirmed by modern methods in the 1980s. This 'prestigious university' literally just had some crackpot give us his pet theory as an example of the kind of fine, high caliber academics that we could look forward to as part of our education at this institution. 😂

(Btw I did end up attending that university for Computer Science, and the lead professor there taught us that we should try to avoid using if statements.) Anyway there's no point or anything just thought I'd share.

[–] 6 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I was barely technical enough to get Mint running so I don't think I'll be hopping on this particular train at the moment. But it's nice to see, though. And if it does turn out in a few years that putting AI into the kernel was a mistake, then I think we'll all be glad for all the projects like this that sprung up.

Hopefully they can give at least a little thought to user friendliness between now and then, lol.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    yea a lot of doctors don't really keep up with the science- and tbh even the science is a bit behind. For what it's worth I can look people in the eye if I really want to, and I'm definitely autistic. Diagnosed and everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago*

    From the abstract of the actual report:

    "The audit found that none of the examined meta-analyses provided a valid basis for the claims they advanced: none had a coherent construct, none sufficiently assessed publication bias, and all had severe heterogeneity. Statistics were misapplied, miscalculated, and misinterpreted. A majority of the randomly vetted primary studies were problematic, most commonly because the outcome measured didn’t match the meta-analysis."

    For example, it mentions further in that of the 49 studies examined, six did not have a control group.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    John Stewart has always been a bothsidser though, it's not like a trick or anything. His style made a lot of sense when things were ""normal"" (like back in 2008) but it doesn't really jive with me in the current landscape.

    Of course, you could argue that that's exactly what the technofeudalists want...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That first photo is just pure cinema, lol. "Moments before disaster" type stuff.
    Anyway I wanted to say thanks for posting these;
    In addition to the occasional gem of photography, this ongoing saga is just one of those things that make lemmy feel like it's actually inhabited by real people. I have no idea how you have time for all these games though. XD

  • source
  • view more: next ›