[–] 2 points 1 day ago

Most people, most of the time, do not care about anything that doesn't directly affect their daily life.

In order to accomplish most things, it requires going against basic human nature.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    Uh huh. And refrigeration has robbed everyone of essential food preservation knowledge.

    Automation does that. Whether it's a bad thing depends upon many factors.

    Current frontier models aren't guaranteed to last. Commoditization is coming and democritization with it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    You aren't obligated to finish every book you start. It's okay to rage-quit in the middle sometimes. Some books are just written terribly or the subject just isn't as interesting as we first thought. You can always come back to it later or try someone else's take on the subject.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    I'm aware. Given the current state of the USA, I understand the willingness to overlook China's imperfections.

    At a certain point, the old tribalistic feuding needs to give way to responsible globalized stewardship of the planets finite resources. To be civilized it's to be scientific; to be scientific requires accepting certain realities about our world.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    You can improve your attention span. It just takes putting effort into it.

    Some things that will help:

    1. Stop watching short-form content. Ban yourself from Instagram, Tiktok, and Shorts/Reels on any site.
    2. Drop off social media as much as possible - check it once a day, for a max of 15 minutes.
    3. Start reading a book for at least 1 hour at least 3 times a week.
    4. Read at least one non-fiction book for every 3 fiction books you read.
    5. Pick up a hobby that requires dedicated focus and practice. Spend your free time doing that instead of doomscrolling.
    6. Spend 30 minutes a week in a quiet space, meditating.
  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I don't really see how that justifies Orwellian censorship online.

    My interpretation on what you've said is just that you don't want to be confronted with the realities of socializing with people who aren't willing to lie to you about their opinions. It used to be normalized that dishonesty and inauthenticity were "politeness" and making yourself palatable to others was productive. But, as we can plainly see world-wide, putting up with assholes just encourages them to be bigger assholes.

    Perhaps rather than thinking the rest of the world is wrong for reacting to you in a way you dislike, you might consider whether there's a common denominator here. Rather than trying to control everyone else, you might want to think about what you can control that's a little closer to home.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago
    1. Because the ratio of drivers to law enforcement allows it.
    2. How speed limits are decided is very complicated. What people "want" isn't the top priority.
    3. Because automated cameras are owned by profit-seeking entities with zero incentive to handle this data appropriately. See: recent Flock abuses as examples.
    4. Those exist but, once again, the ratio of signage to driver is poor.

    Most of your questions also are rooted in what appears to be a lack of appreciation for just how huge the USA is. We can't possibly police all of it and there are very, very good reasons why we shouldn't even try. Especially with the current demented leadership.

  • source
  • view more: next ›