This is why I feel like we need a known, standardised community mod license. Daggerfall Unity uses the MIT license which allows this kind of behaviour. I don't know how much thought the DFU team put into license selection, but I bet most mod authors spent little time on it. A known license that prohibits commercial exploitation but leaves it open for the community to build on it would be ideal imo.

Not just reportedly. Someone leaked the trailer on reddit.

Another studio joins the EA graveyard. EA is such an awful company. Bioware made Baldur's Gate, Dragon Age, Mass Effect, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, and Jade Empire. What a great studio it was. RIP o7

Looks like it might be delayed. According to the F1 website it should start in around 23 minutes.

If we keep going with the DNFs at this rate we won't have any cars left by the end of the race.

Barring Monaco, I think this race might be a contender for the worst race in recent years. Red flag Spa might still have it beat though.

Did they forget that half the field needs to make an extra formation lap? Pit lane order looks wrong for it.

"Pinnacle of motorsports"

I have to agree with you for the original Resident Evil. Which is probably exactly what Capcom thought when they made the remake and introduced Crimson Heads that spawn after you've killed a zombie and didn't burn it with your limited lighter fluid. There is a much bigger incentive to be very selective with which zombies you should kill. OG Resident Evil tried to achieve this only using ammo, but you could still just kill most zombies you encounter.

The author does differentiate it better with the second definition where combat is mandatory in my opinion. I think it fits better to say that the OG survival horror definition is that combat isn't mandatory to progress, whereas more modern ones tend to have mandatory combat.

As per the article, it is by itself not a new technology. Meta has been using this for years and is standard in the industry. So I'd wager most respectable browsers would have tracking prevention that stops this.

What is new, and what this article talks about, is that ChatGPT can attach your browsing habits to things you've shared with ChatGPT itself. As in, possibly very private details about you and your life.

That doesn't sound good. Thanks for the explanation. I can't take another Monaco on the calendar. I guess, let's hope you're wrong?