I've tried all the suggestions made so far by other commenters, and they are solid options IMO. One of my personal requirements has been that the writing tip is either smooth/rounded, retractable, or covered in some way, because I use my pencil a lot every day, and I prefer to keep it in my hip pocket. If a fine tip is exposed, it gets caught in the fabric and/or bent.

For a long time the GraphGear 1000 was my favourite because the tip retracts and it has a sturdy metal body. But it's quite long and heavy, and I had to use the clip, which has a somewhat flimsy hinge joint. If the clip gets ripped off (happens to me) it renders the pencil useless because the clip holds the tip out for writing. I also used Orenz pencils for a while because I like the lead-protecting sleeve, but the tip doesn't seem to be designed to be repeatedly pushed back into the body, because they always start jamming on me pretty quickly.

A few months ago I discovered the Pentel Kerry and it's my new favourite. It has a removeable cap to protect the lead when closed, and to use it you remove the cap (friction/snap fit) and put it on the other end of the pencil like you would with a regular pen. The tip of the cap has a spring-loaded button which connects with the lead advance button on the main pencil body, so you can click on the rear end to advance the lead as normal. Unfortunately I don't think there's a metal body version, but the plastic feels quite sturdy to me.

E-SWAT and Crackdown come to mind immediately. Gain Ground. Contra. Atomic Runner. Bionic Commando.

I'd recommend checking out some sort of catalogue of arcade games. You're right, cyberpunk was big with gamers in the late 1980s, and there were dozens of games that had at least some cyberpunk theming.

It depends very much on how strict you want to be. I'm not familiar with Cyber-Lip, but from screenshots it doesn't look that much more "cyberpunk" to me than Two Crude Dudes. I would call both of them more "futuristic urban decay", which I admit is hard to differentiate.

Drum memory predates the Sinclair by quite a while. But there is an often repeated story involving an impossibly-optimised Blackjack program for a drum memory computer called "The Story of Mel, a Real Programmer".

A friendly heads-up: I think you mean "Liberation Serif". Serif and sans-serif ("without serif") are common categories for fonts.

I sympathize with the point of the article, but if someone's seriously citing Flash, which had widespread success for a run of about 15 years before being overtaken by later developments (driven in part by a billionaire with an axe to grind), as a short-lived "dead end" that was best avoided, then how long do they think is a sensible amount of time to wait to see if something's worth spending time and effort? Nothing remains on top forever.

There was a period there just before the console was discontinued when they tried this style for some Dreamcast packaging in Japan; full-bleed photographs where only the little orange corner logo gave away the branding.

It was wild for a little while after I moved here, picking through secondhand game stores and thinking I'd found some (to me) new treasure, only for it to turn out to be a common Dreamcast accessory in this style of packaging. One of the most unusual is the main console box with a photo of Sega's President at the time, Hidekazu Yukawa. He was the "Public Face of Dreamcast" in Japan for a short time. But although it's unusual, it's not uncommon, and it contained a completely standard Dreamcast console.

Man pages are the only reference material I know that has more information-free circular definition chains than Wikipedia. And I imagine that it's for much the same reason; they're primarily written and fought over by experts who only need terse reminder notes for themselves, and who can't remember what it was like not spending every day up to their elbows in the subject.

I remember the first time I really sat down and played (and finished) the original Legend of Zelda was in the late 90s, well into the PS1 era and 11-13 years after the game was released. Although admittedly, I was a bit older than 13.

Good games are always good games. Once someone is mature enough to see past the historical limitations, they don't seem to matter nearly as much. Last year I saw some tweens commenting about how PS3 games are "unplayable" now, and I laughed. Yeah, that's why no-one plays chess or poker any more. "You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's game!"

I think that the big, highlighted quote a few paragraphs down--which I believe is also by the author of the article, even though they refer to themselves in the third person--seems somewhat at odds with what they say in the rest of the article. I would guess that they started writing it to make an emotional argument, then tried to back it up with logic, but along the way they lost their emotional momentum and forgot exactly what they were supposed to be arguing.

There's an interesting section further down, though:

What do we do about it? This horse is not going back in the barn. The billionaires wouldn't let it, anyway.

There's no need to get it back in the barn; the thing is lame, and only being kept propped up by a lot of (cash) injections and diversions. The facade will fall before they actually get it to work the way they pretend it works.

It's the first law that I'm aware of that legally requires an automated system that you own and operate to snitch on you at any time, to anyone who asks, without asking your permission.

For the moment, it only has to report a piece of data that you are free to lie about. For the moment.

You reminded me of a story I recently read, where the author highlighted just how much awesome programming someone had done by describing how their hands were cramping up.

It's like estimating how well an artist paints by looking at how much paint is on their clothes, or judging how good a cook is by how many cuts and burns they have. The actions that cause those things are incidental to the process, not central, and an excessive amount points to incompetence, not hard and skillful work.

I use Linux on hardware older and less capable than yours, and usually the only real show-stopper I find is a lack of Vulkan support. I don't use any nVidia hardware, but my understanding is that older chips are supported decently by current Linux drivers. So I'd say you'll probably be fine.

As for ten years from now, it's uncommon for Linux software to remove features, and even if it happens, there's virtually always a way for you stay on an old version if you really need to, because there are no forced updates. If you're careful you can sometimes even keep the old versions of things for old software that needs it, while still having the latest version for software that can use it.