Att inte ta upp dualiteten känns ju snarare som ett bristande perspektiv än något annorlunda värt att belysa. Jag skulle hellre ha sett henne ta upp dualiteten och tolka den på ett annat sätt än att låtsas om att den inte finns. På vilket sätt är analysen komplett utan den?

Att inte ta upp protesternas dualitet som både ett uppror mot verkliga orättvisor å ena hållet och som ett orättfärdigat och missriktat våld å andra får artikeln att kännas som inget mer än ett väldigt mångordigt uttryck för allvarlig ignorans.

It's been some weeks since I dove into it, but this article claims that OpenAI solved the Navier-Stokes problem earlier, which is simply didn't as far as I remember? They did some novel development related to the problem based on someone else's solution if I remember correctly.

They said they hoped their developments were independent, but that the model did have access to data about the other, at this stage unpublished, solution.

It sure seems you were frustrated when writing your comments, but it still seems odd to exaggerate your point and call it rational or accurate. I've literally met a bunch of people who have eaten meat for other reasons than it being delicious, so clearly there's more to it than you claim.

Oh lovely! But also, what a way to freak me out...! 😱

Ooooh, very cool art style and design!

I think a very interesting perspective on this is given by the book Doppelaganger: a Trip into the Mirror World, which is generally a banger and a worthwhile read!

I'm sorry there seem to be so many people here who think you're silly if you neither wanna live in a capitalist surveillance state nor a communist surveillance state. I would much rather not live in a surveillance state at all, so I agree with your point.

no one who ever says this ever means it in that way

I enjoy how my very existence is counter-proof, but I do appreciate that you we're exaggerating and I shouldn't interpret you quite that literally.

I get that you call it thought-terminating, I understand that you would want a more detailed explanation from me, and sorry for not bothering to give one. My goal is not to argue with you, you have not convinced me that I have equated the two and I am not ready to spend the time to convince you of the opposite, I just want to say that I don't identify with the accusation.

I'm well aware of the disagreements about who's responsible, my impression was very much that the evidence points towards the Soviets, but I won't pretend to be knowledgeable enough to argue it with you.

Excuse me for bringing up both the Nazis and the Soviets in the same breath, I'm sure you see how follows from the premise of the original meme. I don't want to downplay any progressive effects on the world that the Soviets have, for me good simply does not cancel out evil but coexists confusingly alongside it. The Soviets have done enough bad for me to hate the whole even if there's plenty of good in there, and I don't blame other people or nationals of invaded countries for doing the same.

I'm not sure if my phrasing was unclear or if that many people actually consider hating two things with equating them. Either way, I did not mean to equate them, just to state the reasonability of hating both!

The horrific crime at the top of my mind when writing my comment was the Katyn massacre.