I still have the ~300pg instruction book for it on my shelf. Still the only game instructions I've read cover to cover.
It had a lot more detail than I'd ever seen in a game booklet before.
Great game, and the last civ game I felt like I fully understood (even if I wasn't great at it).
Oh. And I remember my automated workers paving the entire world into roads by mid game.
Having reliable and cheap lighting at all hours of the day.
Light was very expensive for a lot of human history.
If you're hosting static content it's a lot easier. If you've only opened ports 80/443 and don't have any kind of user input or scripting you're (probably) fine. Most likely you'd get DOS'd before someone would hack you. Assuming you're keeping your software up to date.
In general though limit what is exposed to the Internet. In this case don't open any extra ports.
If you want to be more secure (likely overkill for most threat models), treat your webserver like it's always infected. Don't do anything else important on it, and keep it segmented from your other computers with firewall rules.
Realistically no one is going to bother to hack you unless you're posting shit that makes people angry. You're mostly going to get prodded by bots looking for known vulnerabilities in Apache or the like, and you can stay protected with frequent updates.
If you're hosting something dynamic or with code like PHP or something with user accounts and the like, then it's slightly more complicated.
That argument only works to explain and support the existence of millionaires and multimillionaires. With millions of dollars you can hire out most menial tasks easily. Especially if you're still living in a reasonable home.
It falls apart when you reach excessive levels of wealth. Your first few million buys you a lot of time to specialize, but your $101st million buys you less. Even moreso when you get to billions.
On top of everything else people mentioned, it's so profoundly stupid to me that AI is being pushed to take my summary of a message and turn it into an email, only for AI to then take those emails and spit out a summary again.
At that point just let me ditch the formality and send over the summary in the first place.
But more generally, I don't have an issue with "AI" just generative AI. And I have a huge issue with it being touted as this Oracle of knowledge when it isn't. It's dangerous to view it that way. Right now we're "okay" at differentiating real information from hallucinations, but so many people aren't and it will just get worse as people get complacent and AI gets better at hiding.
Part of this is the natural evolution of techology and I'm sure the situation will improve, but it's being pushed so hard in the meantime and making the problem worse.
The first Chat GPT models were kept private for being too dangerous, and they weren't even as "good" as the modern ones. I wish we could go back to those days.