This chart maps Halvorsen’s stock portfolio across financials, tech, and consumer giants. Top holdings include JPMorgan, PNC, Schwab, and Capital One — each above 4%. Tech anchors like Microsoft, and TSMC signal long-term conviction, while Disney, McDonald’s, and Nike add consumer resilience. A diversified 33.92% sits across 51+ smaller positions.

 

This chart ranks the top institutional buyers of Google stock($GOOG+$GOOGL) last quarter, led by Warren Buffett’s massive 17.85M share buy. Renaissance Technologies followed with 4.32M, while Frank Sands, Ken Fisher, and George Soros rounded out the top five. The list blends quant giants, value legends, and activist tacticians — each signaling conviction in Google’s long-term AI moat.

 

Mohnish Pabrai’s Stock Portfolio - Coal, oil, and rigs. Top holding? Warrior Met Coal (34%) Then Alpha Metallurgical (25.9%), Transocean (22.6%), Valaris (15.4%), Noble Corp (2.0%)

Pabrai’s not chasing tech — he’s betting on deep value and energy cycles. This is a contrarian vault built on cash flow and commodity conviction.

 

This pie chart breaks down George Soros’s latest holdings, with a massive 68.88% parked in “Other Holdings” — a mix of options and 133 positions. The remaining 31.12% is spread across Amazon (6.96%), Smurfit Westrock (4.7%), Alphabet (2.28%), and a mix of ETFs, consumer plays, and tech names like NVIDIA, Disney, and Interactive Brokers.

 

This pie chart breaks down Harvard Management Company’s latest holdings(Harvard University Current Portfolio), led by a bold $442.88M position in the iShares Bitcoin ETF (IBIT, 21.04%). Microsoft ($322.84M), Amazon ($235.18M), and Alphabet ($157.09M) anchor the tech stack, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) adds $235.10M in hard asset exposure. Berkshire Hathaway, Nvidia, Apple, and Meta round out the top allocations.

[–] [S] -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Fair question! I tend to share charts and posts from 13Radar and MarketCapWatch because they consistently publish holdings data, fund breakdowns, and market structure visuals that align with the kind of analysis I’m interested in. I find their formats useful for comparing exposure, cap-weighted dynamics, and fund behavior across sectors.

It’s not about promoting a specific site—it’s about using consistent sources to build a coherent lens. If there’s another dataset or angle you think would add value, I’m always open to exploring it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    You're right! Vanguard isn’t sitting in a room hand‑picking Apple or NVIDIA for most of its AUM. The vast majority of those positions come from investors choosing specific index or mutual funds, and those funds are structured to track benchmarks rather than reflect discretionary allocation.

    When people say “Vanguard’s holdings,” it’s shorthand for the aggregate positions across all Vanguard‑managed funds. At the fund level, that shorthand makes sense because Vanguard is the legal manager of the vehicles. At the company level, you’re right—it can be misleading if taken to mean Vanguard is actively allocating capital into those stocks. It’s really about how market‑cap concentration flows through passive vehicles, not Vanguard making stock‑picking calls.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You’re right that technically these assets belong to Vanguard’s fund shareholders, not Vanguard itself. The phrasing “Vanguard’s holdings” is really shorthand for “the aggregate positions across Vanguard-managed funds.” Since the majority of Vanguard’s AUM is in market-cap-weighted index funds, the top holdings naturally mirror the largest companies in the market.

    The reason analysts and media use “Vanguard’s holdings” is because it’s a convenient way to describe how Vanguard allocates capital on behalf of its investors. It doesn’t imply Vanguard owns the companies outright—it reflects the scale of exposure their customers have through Vanguard-managed vehicles.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›