If that dataset has copyrighted material, nvidia committed a clear copyright violation by publishing it publically. I'm happy to trust that nvidias lawyers have vetted it properly.
Nvidia Nemotron has a published dataset, so if they had copyright data in it it would be very easy to determine.
https://huggingface.co/collections/nvidia/nemotron-pre-training-datasets
Some do. University libraries are often late or 24hrs.
https://github.com/bbernhard/signal-cli-rest-api
Its very finicky to setup, but once you get it working its pretty good. Sometimes needs to be reauthenticated though.
Kuma notification settings:
I use a mobile app, so it really doesnt matter to me. Lemmy frontend is a bit shit though
Even under fascism it doesnt make sense to risk zero days on non-high value targets. The fascist way to do that is to simply enforce all devices to have a public and obvious backdoor. Anyone without the backdoor is a criminal.
Zero days are for being sneaky, and are very expensive. Under fascism you don't need to be sneaky, and you need cheap.
It is a catch 22 situation, if you block ads (which is a no-brainer), you can't see the ads repeatedly selling the same item you just bought.
Im personally happy if they simply cannot monetise tracking me. They can track all they want, but if I never see any ads, it's m much harder for them to manipulate me.
A zero click zero day is worth 10s to 100s of millions of dollars. They guard these very carefully, to avoid burning them, like what happened here.
You aren't that important to anyone.
Yup, its all good advice in general, but we should avoid needlessly panicing about things that won't realistically be used against us.
I'm much more concerned about shoddy vpns and ad tech tracking.
Is lateral movement really a risk for you? Most internet malware is fully automated drive-by stuff. They hit you, gain execution and your part of their botnet. They don't need to move laterally, because they have all the execution they need.
Moving laterally requires a human (or agent these days), which has a non-zero time and resource cost, so the only reason anyone is going to do that to you is if you are a very valuable target.
Do whatever you like for learning/fun, but I wouldn't stress to much. Your risk level is probably very low.
This is a nation state level actor using a public ad network.
If your one of the targets of this, none of those measures will help. At best, the adblock will work for the publically known ad networks, but they'll get you with an ad served from a fresh domain. And if they are using zero-click exploits, they likely have a persistence mechanism as well, and even if they don't, they will probably exfil all your data as soon as they can anyway.
The good news is that most people aren't actually useful targets to nation state actors, so all of us are likely safe. We aren't worth risking a zero-click zero day on (or the persistence exploit). Journalists/politicians/military personnel though should be a lot more concerned, but they already have solutions like airgapped networks and other opsec tools.
"The girl next to me in class was bored so she painted my nails, I was bored as well so I let her. No big deal" - Downplays the significance to "bored and fidgeting", which might work?