[–] 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

She had no lawyer. No trial. Yet she was silenced for life - even barred from speaking to the police.

It looks like the intention was then to bankrupt Ms Berki.

The judge had mentioned she had no money, but the order says:

You'd expect the judgment would contain the discussion of whether these restrictions were necessary and proportionate (or even lawful).

It does not.

A lawyer would have raised these points. Ms Berki had no lawyer.

  • source
  • view more: next ›