The US did not want to use the term "climate change" at a major Antarctic meeting, instead preferring to focus on "specific" environmental changes.

Its stance was rebuked by other countries, including France, which described it as a "worrying development" that risks undermining credible science.

Conservationists say "editing words" out of a report won't alter the real impact of climate change.

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 4 months ago

They should send the US envoy home with a bag of seeds each time.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    To be fair, they did use a Sharpie to change the weather pattern once 🙄

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    What is this, 2012?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    At some point they should just be barred from speaking at all

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Hopefully US will just get offended and stop participating. Until now every time they did it allowed sane countries to move things forward.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Even this article has weasel words. We have moved well past the “scientists say” stage and we are at the “climate change” or “human created climate change” stage.

    I wonder what the Australian government position said, probably wimpish.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/climate@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 20 points 4 months ago*

    Every politician or industrilaist who is an active part of the US's attempts to pretend that climate change is not real should be charged with crimes against humanity and, when convicted, should face the full and unfettered consequences due their brazen and callous evil.

  • source