A large body of research, spanning more than 50 years, shows that heavy-handed policing and militarized responses to civil unrest tend to make protests more volatile — not less.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250610115623/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2025/06/09/los-angeles-ice-national-guard-protests

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 67 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Sounds like a great excuse to declare martial law and suspend the constitution.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Probably start at this "parade". Just leave the military out there and call it "protection from the liberal terrorists"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    You get a parade! And you get a parade! Everyone gets a paraaade!

    Such a stupid timeline. We're burning it all down to feed the ego of a guy who can't be convinced his fake tan looks like it was mixed from a prison toilet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And distract attention from him raping underage girls with Epstein

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    His creepy shit is old news. Even if documents clearly confirmed it, it wouldn't move the needle.

    Republicans love grooming and pedophilia. They've long advocated youth indoctrination and child marriage. Their only consistent virtue is winning and being the oppressors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Adding fuel to a fire makes it larger? Fuck me this is breaking news

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I really dislike this dismissive attitude towards "obvious" news.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think you put the wrong word in quotes. "News"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, I didn't. That would be exactly what I'm saying I dislike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Its not news tho. Its history. So even calling this news is wrong, which is why "news" should be the word in quotes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    No im not. I havent challenges your point about dismissive altitudes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Dismissing the article as not being "news" is exactly the same sentiment as the news being "obvious".

    It's not new information to you, but you are just speaking for yourself. Rather than holding back to avoid annoying people like you, I'd rather things be shared freely to inform the masses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Is this the past that righties want, the subdued public discourse over shooting our own? Cause they can catch shots too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Yeah I think that's actually the plan here though

  • source