all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 36 points 4 months ago (4 children)

People must oppose “smart” glasses with cameras and microphones without compromise.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is the main reason why I haven’t bought Oakleys or RayBans. I will not support companies that agree to make their products spying machines. I bought SunGod instead - better on every front, with 1% for the planet pledge and B Corp certification. European (UK) - without shitty face recognition in them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    Obligatory comment on the complete lack of accountability:

    were sorry :: width=50%

  • source
  • [–] [S] 16 points 4 months ago

    Nordic countries should ban the sale of these horrible surveillance glasses.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    look, having a little screen on my glasses? That would be cool, I don’t want a fucking camera and mic. Why would I want that? I don’t silm every second of my life and don’t want to.

    Why would I want to risk a company like Facebook being able to see litteraly everything I do?

    This is a great example of a company pushing a product because it would be convenient for them if it caught on, rather than because any consumer want it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    So now they are doing it server-side?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 80 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I don't trust Meta with anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    One memo reportedly described releasing it during a “dynamic political environment,” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted. Last week, WIRED reported that much of NameTag’s machinery was already built into the Meta AI app, downloaded by millions of users, as early as January, even as Meta publicly said it had made no final decision about face recognition.

    Sound likes a stellar company

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    As well you shouldn't. Back at the beginning of the year the NYT dropped a bunch of leaked memos about such a feature and at the time Facebook claimed that they weren't planning to release such a thing.

    Now there's actual code for it, and their newest leaked memos prove they actually were planning to release such a thing and even had planned to do so at a time when people would be distracted by politics or other hot button issues so they could fly under the radar and not face as much backlash.

  • source
  • parent