Mine doesn’t even say “Teams” anymore in the taskbar. Just has the Teams logo and says Copilot no matter what I do. Along with 9+ notifications icon, even though I have no notifications. It has been 2 months like this.
post
"I hate 2FA" - people who don't understand 2FA
I understand 2fa, but the way many companies have implemented it is such a shit implementation that it's nothing more than security theater designed to purposely make my life difficult, but not actually secure anything. Anything to do with medical stuff seems to be particularly bad. And OMG, don't get me started on the shit they put behind 2fa for no reason other than fuck with you. Why do I need to log in so I can see some completely public information? Just so they can track me... Ok, I will fucking log in then... And it's behind 2fa... And because they don't give a fuck the 2fa server never sends 2fa verification.
So, I think 2fa is technically a great idea and the way to go, but at the same time, I fucking hate 2fa.
"Someone decided our current authentication wasn't trusted enough so we're adding 2FA to this system. We now need to you give us information we didn't already have over this untrusted mechanism, which we will then trust because it's convenient for us."
Okay, fair enough, hating on shitty 2FA is something I can get behind. Like,whatever the fuck Paypal is doing, funfact: Customer support can just turn it off.
To connect to my work VPN I have to enter my userid and password on the PC (that I'm already signed into with the same) then unlock my phone, and then open the app, enter the # shown on my PC, then enter my pin on my phone again. Then half the time the connection fails and I have to do it all again. Why it can't skip the second pin because I JUST FUCKING USED IT TO UNLOCK MY PHONE I don't know. Then if I want to use teams on my phone I have to use my pin again then I have to also use it to get into outlook, repeatedly all day. Microsoft products are garbage.
To that point: it's 2 factor authentication. That is, proving who you are through 2 different factors, usually something you know (a password) + something you have (a physical device) or something you are (biometrics).
The point is that "something you know" can often be easily acquired by malicious third parties and it is generally much harder for them to gain access to "something you have" or "something you are". Thus requiring 2 different factors blocks most nefarious access attempts.
Authorization is a separate, different step that, usually after having already proven you are who you say you are, verifies whether you're allowed to do what you're trying to do. This generally doesn't require multiple factors because you've got nothing left to prove: the system knows all about what you're permitted to do.
Mnemonic:
- authentication: you are an authentic person (as opposed to impersonating someone)
- authorization: you are authorized to perform an action
It's possible to understand 2FA, be all for the extra security it can provide, and wanting it enabled for important logins. And at the same time hate it for how annoying it can be.
And that's even not getting into the poorly designed and implemented 2FA systems, many of which end up not actually providing any extra security.
It's from a show called Death Note. A guy finds a book in which you enter the names of people you want dead, and then they die. It's a pretty good show. Kind of a cat and mouse detective show almost, but with a supernatural twist.
The main character is kind of a dumbass though. Even as far as teenagers with delusions of grandeur go.
All he had to do was stop writing names for a while after L very publicly announced that he was narrowing the search area. It's his own ego that pushes him to come up with elaborate ways to hide what he's doing as the number of suspects dwindles.
As soon as he learns that you can affect the time and manner of death, he could have made all the rest seem like accidents, spread out over years. Again, it's his own ego that gets in the way; he wants people to know the deaths are connected.
But that's the point - he wanted people to know they were connected because he wanted society to change. And IIRC at some point it worked. People started not committing crimes because they were scares they'd get killed.
Spoiler, perhaps.
It's a 20 year old show.
Though? You think the show is bad due to this or why the "though"?
I think it detracts from the main premise of a detective show. Not that it becomes automatically bad; all the other characters carry it enough. But it would be a truly great show if Light was as intelligent as he is presented to be.
As it is, Death Note is less of a detective show involving supernatural elements, but a show about supernatural involving detective elements. The story I got from it wasn't of two masterminds clashing in a battle of strategy, but of a vulnerable teenager being used by supernatural entities for their amusement. Which makes me feel misled.
Why were you expecting something in the first place? Doesn't sound to me like it's the fault of the show.
I thought the show was amazing. Very novel concept. Both sides don't need to be masterminds. I don't see how that would've been better. The deductions of one mastermind is enough for me to ride on. 👍
Why were you expecting something in the first place?
Because that's how storytelling works? If you don't expect anything from the story, you aren't invested into it and you aren't enjoying it.
I mean why were you expecting something beforehand? Not during. I wasn't expecting anything, and I still enjoyed the show for what it was. No need to add a second mastermind. What happened in the show was exciting, and I'm not so sure adding a second mastermind would've made it better. 🤷♂️
Because the first few episodes leads you to it. You get this cool main character who takes it upon himself to purge the world of those who can't be made responsible for their evil otherwise, and then you get the detective angle. It clearly tries to be Holmes Vs Moriarty type of thing, except with the opposite PoV. If you didn't get those expectations from the show itself and enjoyed it, good for you! It was a different experience for me, especially with how much praise I've heard about it beforehand
Sounds to me like you are watching this show, right, and then you notice it resembles something you've experienced before, and then you get "mad" because it's not exactly/more like that. But with a different POV etc. That's what I'm reading here. 🤷♂️
You're putting it on the show that it "clearly tries" to be something that you've experienced. If one isn't familiar with Holmes and Moriarty, the show will not seem to be trying to be anything. It just is.
It's a very common thing that people do, and it takes will and physiological psychological determination to stop doing, so you can just enjoy content for what it is rather than compare it to something else. It doesn't need to be what you've seen before. 🙂👍
Sounds to me like you're reading way too much into other people not liking the same thing you like. It's a very common thing that people do, and it takes will and physiological determination to stop doing, so you can just enjoy the content for what it is rather than seek validation in others' opinions.
You really don't have to fanboy for Light this hard.
Sounds to me like you're ignoring my arguments and just parroting my shit. Pretty childish. 🫤
Especially when it's fully unfounded. I'm not a "fan" of the show and I never was or said I was. I just enjoyed it. And I'm not a fan of any particular character, specifically, either. Definitely not seeking your validation at all, holy hell. 😄
Can you deny the veracity of my arguments though?
There is no argument, though. You're expressing your subjective opinion, which is normal to have. What's not normal is expecting everyone else to have the same opinion and presenting disagreement as some sort of disorder that I need to get over. That's the validation seeking behaviour.
Nope, you're overthinking it. I'm not saying you have a disorder.
And I don't seek your validation, I already told you that.
My god this is long winded.
The first comment made in reply to me was "he is dumb though" as if it is wrong to say the show is good.
Though.
Tell me how that comment isn't expecting others to agree with that opinion? Did you notice how that's what I reacted to from the start?
You saying I need "will and physiological determination" (whatever that means) definitely read like you think I have physiological issues. Which means a disorder. For someone who doesn't seek validation, you're very eager to try and present your subjective opinion (enjoying the show) as an objective fact (show is good). I didn't enjoy the show as much as you because of the main character, that is all. You insisting I must have had some expectations from outside of the show that make my opinion invalid is exactly the kind of overthinking you're projecting on me.
Just because I used the word "psychological" in a sentence when talking to you doesn't mean I'm saying you have a disorder, lol, wtf. Definitely putting words in my mouth, and/or projecting, who knows.
You're still not understanding what point I'm making. All I'm saying is that you've acted since our first interaction like I wasn't entitled to saying the show is pretty good. You said "he's a dumbass though". THOUGH. You understand the meaning of that word in its context? It's the same meaning as "but". As in you are objecting.
So, no, I'm still not seeking validation (so drop it), and I'm still not trying to validate my opinion. I'm just saying that you're putting your opinion against mine like yours is a fact that makes the show worse, when that isn't the case. I don't know if you've noticed you've done this. I say this to you but you are glossing over it each time. Just like I bet you will this time.
You've used the word "physiological", brother. You're literally backtracking on the exact words you've used while nitpicking on mine, and then you're telling me I'm the one projecting.
I'm just saying that you're putting your opinion against mine like yours is a fact that makes the show worse,
Which is not what's happening here, you're still making shit up.
I suppose I shouldn't have replied to any of your comments past the first. I dared to dislike something that you like, which immediately makes all my replies invalid and you always correct. You can go on and have a nice rewatch of Death Note or something. I'm quite done with this argument.
You've used the word "physiological", brother.
Thanks, I see where the mishap occurred, that was a swipe type typo. Corrected to "psychological". 👍 Probably a huge source of confusion between us, unfortunately.
But since you just want out of this, let's indeed cut it here. You're not representing my arguments in a correct light at all, and I'm probably not representing myself well in this conversation either, so it's better to just say adieu. 🤝 We're probably just talking past each other completely (myself included as also guilty, most likely).
I'm gonna continue watching Fear The Walking Dead. 😉 Have you seen that shit? That shit fyre. Hoping there's some tie-ins to The Walking Dead, which I just finished.
What's wrong with 2FA?
If they're also complaining about Teams, I'd venture to guess that they're complaining about the near incomprehensible implementation within Microsoft Office ecosystem (and their web UIs).
Passkeys
Digital ID verification requirements/laws
Chrome-only websites
Dell
Did you think Light was the hero when you watched it the first time? He's a teenage kid who suddenly gets way too much power, thoroughly abuses it, then starts killing innocents to avoid the consequences of his own actions. Even if his first few kills were literal supervillains, there is no justice in a world where Light decides who lives or dies.
Your idea of a revolutionary undermining the system is also an interesting story idea, but it's a very different story idea.
It really is the anime Starship Troopers.
True, I think both take advantage of our inherent bias to pick the side of the main characters and then push and push into the dark side until you have to admit that maybe they are the bad guys after all. Catching onto it after 10 episodes or on the second viewing isn't a fundamental difference in that regard.
I only liked that show because of the power fantasy aspects. Looking back it's cringe AF.
Yeah, that story idea is V for Vendetta (the grapic novel more than the movie).
That's kinda the point, Light is an ergonomical lunatic with a god complex who very early on starts killing more or less innocent people for the insult of getting in his way. He isn't an anti-hero he is a sociopathic lunatic who if he was in a grimdark setting would be sitting next to Griffith and FUCKING Erebus. Hell he isn't even all that complex since at least say Erin Yeager had the excuse of getting mind fucked and being put into a bad situation by himself, his ancestor, and the fact the world was genocidal to his people.
At least he's reducing workplace repetitive stress injuries
Well, he thinks criminals are such because they're evil or something. He thinks the only way to stop them is by creating a totalitarian state where he is God and everyone does his bidding lest they invoke his ire.
The thin veil of "making the world a better place" was lifted super early in the series, when he started killing people that weren't criminals, justifying it as "if they go against my plans they may as well be criminals".
He was never supposed to be a good guy. He's an arrogant piece of shit, and that's why he got caught.
It took me a while to realize he was writing 2fa in the hopes it would "die", the first few times i saw this i presumed it was some kind of trick were the book was asking for another factor.
all 60 comments