iiiiiiitttttttttttt

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

I used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports

hideshow 5 child comments

parent

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically

parent

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish

parent

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit

parent

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient

parent

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS.

parent

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Having IKEv2 and IPsec as separate items doesn't make sense. IKEv2 is an authentication protocol, which IPsec can use for key exchange.

Perhaps instead have "IKEv2/IPsec" and "L2TP/IPsec". Or even OpenSSH tunnels?

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I don't think I've ever used IKEv2 outside of IPsec.

I have, however, used ipsec with Ike (fortinet) and l2tp (cisco)

parent

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Which one is Neutral Evil ?

[–] discozombie@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Cisco AnyConnect

parent

[–] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why is Cisco Anyconnect neutral evil?

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

because Cisco

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] doomsdayrs@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

I am clueless

parent

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

parent

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 point 4 months ago

SoftEther doesn't belong in one spot because it emulates several different types of VPN transports simultaneously: PPTP, IPsec, SSTP, OpenVPN, pure TLS etc.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)

Wireguard lawful good? https://medium.com/@cyberlpz777/wireguard-as-a-stealth-c2-channel-abuse-of-modern-vpns-evasion-and-detection-a4663a2df874

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 1 point 3 weeks ago*

That's a good thing, you want your VPN to be stealthy and hard to detect.