▲ 94 ▼ VPN Protocol Alignment chart (feddit.nl) submitted 4 months ago by Fontasia@feddit.nl to c/iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 38 points 4 months ago (6 children) Psychotic: https://github.com/earthquake/XFLTReaT Tunnel your packets over DNS requests. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children) I used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish permalink fedilink source parent [–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children) I used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish permalink fedilink source parent [–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 child) I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 child) What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient permalink fedilink source parent
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS. permalink fedilink source parent