All this shit that should be studied for links to autism and the RFK braintrust is focused on the cheapest, easiest, lowest effort, yet effective healthcare we have.
post
Breast milk samples from mothers in Seattle contain alarming levels of dangerous hormone-disrupting chemicals, including BPA, BPS, melamine, cyanuric acid, and triclosan, new peer-reviewed research has found.
Yikes
Could this be why there are so many trans people all of a sudden?
No. Trans people have always been around. The media and politicians just chose to focus on them lately
I know they've always been around but there's a huge increase in the number of people that identify as trans over the last 15 years
Partly because media focus bringing attention to the idea you can be trans. Partly because increasing acceptance. Not breast milk hormones
Disclaimer: I am cishet, so I might be ignorant.
The hard dilemma many of them are placed in is being unhappy and living as a cis, or potentially being happy by living as their true self. Unfortunately many choose the first option because the latter is believed to be worse. This is how it has been until quite recently. They are basically caught between two bad situations. In which one MIGHT be better.
Some people talk about how some people regret gender affirming care, and want to reverse it. This is something that is sometimes done, not as a result of actually being cis, but because they believe it is easier than being openly trans. It is incredibly sad to think about.
All society have to do is not give a fuck, and they would be able to be themselves. Instead so many people are being forced to live unhappy lives. Just because we could not give a fuck about something that does not affect us.
I like to point to another instance of something similar happening with left handedness. See, there was a huge stigma around being left handed that was very religiously ingrained (sinister being a term for someone being left handed), and children were mostly taught to be right handed because of this. Like, forcably switching hands for writing and eating and other activities if they used "the wrong hand". But, when this stopped being so poorly thought of and stopped being forced on children, left handedness SPIKED! You know, until it reached population levels, which is somewhere around 1 in 9. And then it stayed there.
Because, like, obviously left handed people didn't just appear out of nowhere. They were always there. They were just being forced to be right handed. And it was causing a lot of unnecessary trauma to force them to be right handed.
You got it pretty well, but I think it's also worth acknowledging just how difficult transition was back in the day.
Until the rise of informed consent in the mid 10s in the US, you needed a letter of recommendation from a therapist to start hormones. Depending on time period and therapist this could range from a sympathetic therapist double checking that you've thought everything through and it's not spur of the moment (still took 3-12 months and associated therapy fees) which is what I got, to a year or more of a therapist investigating to prove whether you're a "true transsexual" or not (best hope you're either transitioning to hetero or able to convincingly lie about it) and to ensure that there's no way for you to function without transitioning.
RLE (real life experience) was the default until falling out of fashion in the 10s in the US. It was basically you have to live full time as your preferred gender (as the doctor sees it) often requiring passing for cis or meeting some attractiveness standard, for anywhere from a few months to 2 years, after which point you could be prescribed hormones. Hell, in the mid 10s a friend got denied a letter of recommendation because she didn't wear a skirt and makeup to the therapist. RLE was sometimes compared to hazing.
For a long time therapists also had weird expectations on trans people like that we should go "stealth" ie start a new life where nobody knows we're trans. I think it was the 90s when a controversial study was done where the researcher followed trans people long enough to become trusted only to find that once we trusted them we stopped being overly performative of our genders in front of them.
Oh and this isn't even touching on the difficulty of finding a doctor to prescribe hormones, which still isn't easy.
And that's not touching on the social side. You're looking at violence, especially of the intimate partner variety, and disowning. You're looking at your career prospects likely being torpedoed and possibly being pushed into sex work (or at the very least for it to be a real concern). You're looking at a really difficult life, and this is previous generations so by the time someone figures this out about themselves they may be married with kids.
When I started transitioning in 2015 there were still trans people giving the advice to wait to start until you were deciding between transition and suicide. Transitioning was the best decision I ever made, and yeah I don't blame them for that advice. When it's that hard, you need to know there's no going back before you start.
Thanks for taking the time to explain it for me ❤️
Absolutely! A lot of this knowledge has become less common even among trans people as people who transitioned in that era are often still uncomfortable being open and self advocating because they'd been taught so strongly not to, meanwhile once it became easier and more acceptable they wound up vastly outnumbered. Also aids killed a lot of the open trans people.
And yeah I think it's really easy for people, such as the one you were replying to, who don't know much to just observe that there sure seem to be a lot more of us these days and make a guess as to why that fits within narratives that make sense to them. I can't even be too mad, as that's kinda just how people work. What irritates me is how often such narratives are prioritized to equal to or greater than informed and cohesive positions. And yeah there's a reason we like to pull out the graph of rate of left handedness over time.
And I should note, I'm not even saying that hormone disrupters in the water aren't increasing the rates of trans people, it's a plausible hypothesis, it's just that you'd need to control for a lot of social variables and that's very difficult.
It's way easier and safer to transition, especially openly. I'd suspect that first. Like seriously, it was nuts how difficult it was in the 80s, much less like the 60s. And everyone who wanted to transition knew it.
just gonna drop this from the article:
Babadi emphasized that breastfeeding remains the healthiest choice for infants when possible, because it is the most nutritious and generally the safest option. Many of the same chemicals are also found in formulas. However, Babadi added that the study’s results underscore a “widespread, systemic problem” because chemical companies are so widely using the compounds, and regulators are failing to rein in their use.
The study’s authors note a limitation in its small sample size. It also included mothers who are broadly more educated and higher-income. Some of the compounds were found at levels below the World Health Organization’s tolerable daily intake level, the study noted, but still at levels that previous research has shown may cause disease.
While taking steps like not buying plastic can help mothers avoid the chemicals, the compounds are so ubiquitous in consumer goods that people “cannot shop their way out of this,” Babadi said.
The results come as the Trump EPA launches a multi-pronged attack on chemical regulations. It has moved to undo limits on many toxic chemicals and carcinogens in consumer goods or water. It has also attempted to weaken the regulatory process, while Congress is considering gutting the nation’s laws around toxic chemicals.
Study brought to you by Nestlé ™, because fuck your tiddies, buy our formula, now with 33% less toxicity.
all 18 comments