top 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I don’t know if “certified fresh” or “rotten” is good on the website rotten tomatoes, and at this point I’m scared to ask.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Fresh means most critics liked it, certified fresh means the majority of critics liked it.

    But those are just critics, pay attention to the audience score (popcorn bucket) instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    Nah. The audience score is vulnerable to being manipulated by both bots, coordinated hate campaigns and diehard fans that loose objectivity. I understand why some people will prefer a general population consensus but I always put more weight with the well written columnists over the flippant audience reviews.

    Edit: exactly what I'm talking about lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    I'm sure I'll watch it eventually. But man that is a horrible title

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Rotten tomatoes is worthless. Metacritic is where it’s at.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The advertising for this was dogshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The trailer just.....it just looks pretentious or something. Can't quite put my finger on it, but I did not like the trailer I saw. The deer?

    Hope it works better in the movie than it did in the trailer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Given how easy is to get 100% on Rotten, I'm going to assume that this is a pretty meh movie.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    81% For a big budget movie doesn’t sound that great. I suppose it could be worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    This is the problem with aggregated review and the mentality surrounding them. It doesn't mean that it scored an objective 81% score, it means 19% of people didn't like it. Film is art and art is subjective and viewers are not monoliths.

    I don't care what Joe Schmoe at the the NYT thinks about a piece of art, the only reviews that matter to me are the ones written by people with similar tastes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Is it a PsyOp movie?

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago* (7 children)

    Hard pass on Zionist movies

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    To my understanding, in the past 2 years his foundation has since started funding other orgs that are protesting Israel, so ignoring that in favour of events around the time of the Hamas attack, when everybody was in emotional shock, is rather questionable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    It seems though it wasnt a shock that led him to zionism, but it was some sorry of shock that seemed to led him out of that.

    Since he devoted seemingly His Life to Israel. But maybe he comes around devoting how Life to the education about genocide noch Matter who commits it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    He made some statements just after the Hamas attack, when everybody and their grandma was in shock. He's also been funding orgs that protest Israel, leading to their media branding him a traitor to the race, but never mind that. Focus on the statements.

  • source
  • parent