18
Slightly off-topic - a new AskHistorians comm has opened, for those interested! (piefed.social)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/historyphotos@piefed.social
comment fedilink hide all child comments

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
5 comments in c/newcommunities@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Are we allowed to ask about stuff over 5000 years old?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Is it going to be strictly moderated to require some semblance of evidence or sources?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 5 months ago

    Not generally. If a claim is questioned, it's expected that it should be backed up with a source, but we're all part-time amateurs shitposting on an obscure form of social media, here - expecting every answer to be initially sourced is not really realistic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Subscribed!!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    3 comments in c/historyartifacts@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    @PugJesus Are the posts on the site not populating via @historymemes?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • 2 comments in c/historymemes@piefed.social view that post
    [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I like rule #4. No idea why you would be so oddly specific though. 😇 😙

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Real cool, that was my favourite sub on Reddit, I missed it a bit when I deleted my account. It's more practical to send the link wit the exclamation mark tho !askhistorians@piefed.social

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •